[Lustre-discuss] lustre error about ldlm process

huangql huangql at ihep.ac.cn
Sun Nov 8 16:52:01 PST 2009


Hi,

Thank you for your advice!
I wonder that the lustre error is a bug for version 1.6.6 or not. We plan to upgrade the server to 1.8.1.1, Does the  bug fix? And I still don't know why so many ldlm processes exsit in server, is it normal? Can someone give me more details about this? Thanks a lot!

Thanks,
Sarea



2009-11-09 



huangql 



发件人: Wolfgang Stief 
发送时间: 2009-11-06  16:42:07 
收件人: lustre-discuss 
抄送: 
主题: Re: [Lustre-discuss] lustre error about ldlm process 
 
Hi!
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:25:56 +0800
"huangql" <huangql at ihep.ac.cn> wrote:
> 
> we can see many processes about ldlm, it's up to hundreds. As a
> result, the load avarage is too high (155.0 165.0 145.0) to work
> normally.However, we have no idea and have to restart the nodes. At
> the same time,we can get the log as follows: The filesystem features:
> Server: lustre 1.6.6 Client: lustre 1.6.5
We experienced the same with 1.8.1 servers and 1.8.0.1 clients.
Two weeks ago we upgraded the servers (2 MDS, 5 OSS) to 1.8.1.1 and
haven't seen this behaviour since.
wolfgang
-- 
Wolfgang Stief
Dipl.-Ing. (FH)
Senior Systems Engineer Unix, Storage, Archiving
wolfgang.stief at best.de
best Systeme GmbH
Muenchner Str. 123a
85774 Unterfoehring, Germany
Phone +49 89 2060 308 - 0
Fax +49 89 950 60 70
http://www.best.de/
Registergericht Muenchen HRB 10 68 20
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michael Beeck, Matthias Gottschalk
_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20091109/04a7a129/attachment.htm>


More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list