[Lustre-discuss] intrepid kernel on jaunty
Bernd Schubert
bs_lists at aakef.fastmail.fm
Thu Oct 29 07:09:52 PDT 2009
On Thursday 29 October 2009, Ralf Utermann wrote:
> Papp Tamás schrieb:
> > Papp Tamás wrote, On 2009. 10. 28. 22:01:
> >> Brian J. Murrell wrote, On 2009. 10. 28. 20:26:
> >>> Additionally, b1_8 (aka 1.8.2) also has debian packaging support (on an
> >>> unsupported basis at this point) in /debian. Here are the installed
> >>> packages, built from the /debian in b1_8 from my client:
> >>>
> >>> ii lustre-client-modules-2.6.28-11-generic 1.8.1.50-2 Lustre
> >>> Linux kernel module (kernel 2.6.28-11 ii lustre-tests
> >>> 1.8.1.50-2 Test suite for the Lustre filesystem ii
> >>> lustre-utils 1.8.1.50-2 Userspace
> >>> utilities for the Lustre filesyste
> >
> > Somehow I could make the debs, but not the modules, only these:
> >
> > liblustre_1.8.1.50-1_amd64.deb
> > lustre-dev_1.8.1.50-1_amd64.deb
> > lustre-tests_1.8.1.50-1_amd64.deb
> > linux-patch-lustre_1.8.1.50-1_all.deb
> > lustre-source_1.8.1.50-1_all.deb
> > lustre-utils_1.8.1.50-1_amd64.deb
>
> then install lustre-source_1.8.1.50-1_all.deb, and build the modules
> using 'm-a build lustre ' . You might need to chmod +x
> /usr/src/modules/lustre/debian/rules .
I might be the only one complaining, but I think the method I proposed with
attachment 24529 (https://bugzilla.lustre.org/attachment.cgi?id=24529) was
more convenient, as least when you just want to build packages, e.g. in a
chroot. Just autotools support was missing to automatically do the sed steps.
And no, when Brian was working on this, I really didn't have the time to step
in, I had been already far above 16 hours per day that time.
--
Bernd Schubert
DataDirect Networks
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list