[Lustre-discuss] Question on setting up fail-over
Kevin Van Maren
Kevin.Van.Maren at oracle.com
Mon Aug 9 11:08:20 PDT 2010
On Aug 9, 2010, at 11:45 AM, David Noriega <tsk133 at my.utsa.edu> wrote:
> My understanding of setting up fail-over is you need some control over
> the power so with a script it can turn off a machine by cutting its
> power? Is this correct?
It is the recommended configuration because it is simple to understand
and implement.
But the only _hard_ requirement is that both nodes can access the
storage.
> Is there a way to do fail-over without having
> access to the pdu(power strips)?
If you have IPMI support, that can be used for power control, instead
of a switched PDU. Depending on the storage, you may be able to do
resource fencing of the disks instead of STONITH. Or you can run fast-
and-loose, without any way to ensure the dead node is really "dead"
and not accessing storage (at your risk). While Lustre has MMP, it is
really more to protect against a mount typo than to guarantee resource
fencing.
> Thanks
> David
>
> --
> Personally, I liked the university. They gave us money and facilities,
> we didn't have to produce anything! You've never been out of college!
> You don't know what it's like out there! I've worked in the private
> sector. They expect results. -Ray Ghostbusters
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list