[Lustre-discuss] lfs --obd discrepancy to lctl dl (1.8.3)
Heiko Schröter
schroete at iup.physik.uni-bremen.de
Wed Aug 11 00:53:01 PDT 2010
Hello,
lfs prints different obd(idx) compared to lctl dl. We use single striping.
cluster1 tmp # lfs find --obd scia-OST0017_UUID /data/scia/L0/V0.00/20100327/SCI_NL__0PNPDE20100327_193441_000040582088_00071_42209_1158.N1
/data/scia/L0/V0.00/20100327/SCI_NL__0PNPDE20100327_193441_000040582088_00071_42209_1158.N1
cluster1 tmp # lfs getstripe /data/scia/L0/V0.00/20100327/SCI_NL__0PNPDE20100327_193441_000040582088_00071_42209_1158.N1
/data/scia/L0/V0.00/20100327/SCI_NL__0PNPDE20100327_193441_000040582088_00071_42209_1158.N1
lmm_stripe_count: 1
lmm_stripe_size: 1048576
lmm_stripe_offset: 23
obdidx objid objid group
23 41020 0xa03c 0
cluster1 tmp # lctl dl
<snip>
19 UP osc scia-OST0010-osc-ffff8800bb076000 c50eddc4-14c3-66a0-0f8d-7bc8e2b9a1e8 4
20 UP osc scia-OST0011-osc-ffff8800bb076000 c50eddc4-14c3-66a0-0f8d-7bc8e2b9a1e8 4
21 UP osc scia-OST0012-osc-ffff8800bb076000 c50eddc4-14c3-66a0-0f8d-7bc8e2b9a1e8 4
22 UP osc scia-OST0013-osc-ffff8800bb076000 c50eddc4-14c3-66a0-0f8d-7bc8e2b9a1e8 4
23 UP osc scia-OST0014-osc-ffff8800bb076000 c50eddc4-14c3-66a0-0f8d-7bc8e2b9a1e8 5
24 UP osc scia-OST0015-osc-ffff8800bb076000 c50eddc4-14c3-66a0-0f8d-7bc8e2b9a1e8 5
25 UP osc scia-OST0016-osc-ffff8800bb076000 c50eddc4-14c3-66a0-0f8d-7bc8e2b9a1e8 5
26 UP osc scia-OST0017-osc-ffff8800bb076000 c50eddc4-14c3-66a0-0f8d-7bc8e2b9a1e8 5
27 UP osc scia-OST0018-osc-ffff8800bb076000 c50eddc4-14c3-66a0-0f8d-7bc8e2b9a1e8 5
28 UP osc scia-OST0019-osc-ffff8800bb076000 c50eddc4-14c3-66a0-0f8d-7bc8e2b9a1e8 5
<snap>
According to "lfs find" the stripe should be on scia-OST0017_UUID. "lfs gestripe" reports to have it on obdidx 23 , which is scia-OST0014 according to lctl dl.
Which one is true ? As fas as i remember it worked correctly in 1.6.6.
We updated currently from 1.6.6 to 1.8.3. Could have been something broken during upgrade ?
Thanks and Regards
Heiko
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list