[Lustre-discuss] fsck.ext4 for device ... exited with signal 11.

[Larry]

Old version of e2fsprogs actually has bugs like this, the newer the
better, I think

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Craig Prescott <prescott at hpc.ufl.edu> wrote:
> Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> Do you have enough RAM to run e2fsck on this node?  Have you tried running it under gdb to see if it can catch the sig11 and print a stack trace?
>
> Yup, plenty of RAM - we've got 32GB in this node.
>
> We've already started up fsck again using Colin's suggestion of
> e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.  So far so good.  But if we need to fire it up
> under gdb, I guess that's what we'll do.
>
> Thanks,
> Craig Prescott
> UF HPC Center
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>