[Lustre-discuss] Question on versions, who is going to support what, etc.

Robert Read rread at whamcloud.com
Tue Dec 14 10:34:26 PST 2010


On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:13 , Joe Landman wrote:

> On 12/14/2010 12:09 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> The 1.8 branch is in "maintenance mode" and will only be getting bug
>> fixes. All new development is being done on the 2.x branch.
>> 
>> We are finalizing the patches being landed on the Git master branch
>> in anticipation of the upcoming 2.1 release, so testing and feedback
>> of this branch is very welcome at this stage.  A few mature "feature"
>> patches are still being considered, but at this stage it is largely
>> bug fixing only until the 2.1 branch is released.
>> 
>> There are weekly build tags being created, that are suitable for
>> external testing. My understanding is that build 8 (v2_0_58_0, IIRC)
>> performed quite well, and a performance regression is being
>> investigated in build 9 (v2_0_59_0).
> 
> Greetings Andreas
> 
>   Thanks!  We are doing RPM builds from clones of the git trees now.  I 
> wanted to understand where 1.8.x was headed, and see if we should have 
> multiple build processes going on.  I presume the OpenSFS and other 
> folks are also converged around 2.x?  Hopefully?

Hi Joe,

Whamcloud is supporting both 1.8 and 2.x, and our development efforts are concentrating on 2.x. We're also building rpms for both 1.8 and 2.x on our Hudson server here:

http://build.whamcloud.com/


cheers,
robert

> 
>   Regards
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> -- 
> Joseph Landman, Ph.D
> Founder and CEO
> Scalable Informatics Inc.
> email: landman at scalableinformatics.com
> web  : http://scalableinformatics.com
>        http://scalableinformatics.com/sicluster
> phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121
> fax  : +1 866 888 3112
> cell : +1 734 612 4615
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss




More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list