[Lustre-discuss] Lustre community build server

[Robert Read]

Hi Aurélien,

Yes, we've noticed Hudson's support for testing is not quite what we need, so we're planning to use Hudson to trigger our testing system, but not necessarily to manage it.  We'd definitely be interested in learning more about your experiences, though. 

robert




On Dec 16, 2010, at 1:22 , DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:

> Hi Robert,
> 
> That's very interesting.
> At CEA we also have a Hudson platform and I'm running acceptance-small for several Lustre branches in it. Hudson is a great tool but it was not design to test tools that run kernel-space that can crash your nodes or, at least, put your kernel in a bad shape. I will be very interested to share Hudson experience testing Lustre and see how you've configured it for your own tests.
> 
> 
> Aurélien
> 
> Robert Read a écrit :
>> Hi,
>> 
>> As I mentioned the other day, Whamcloud is hosting a Hudson build server and producing snapshot builds for Centos 5.x (and Ubuntu 10.4 when it works) for both 1.8.x and 2.x branches. Our intention is for this to be a resource for the Lustre community to find recent Lustre packages for variety of Linux distributions. Early next year we'll connect this to our test system so at least some of the packages can be tested, as well.
>> 
>> We would be interested in hearing from anyone that would like to participate producing builds. Hudson is an distributed system, and it's easy to add more build nodes, even behind firewalls (some of us are running build VMs on our home machines). If you would like add another distribution or architecture we don't have yet, or even one we do have (the more the merrier), we'd be happy to work with you to do that.  Please contact me if you are interested.  
>> cheers,
>> robert
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>>  
>