[Lustre-discuss] Infiniband VS 1GiG Transfer rates. Confused
Erik Froese
erik.froese at gmail.com
Wed Feb 10 21:00:38 PST 2010
Jagga,
I think this is more a function of scp than than ib in general. Have
you tried using the HPN-SSH patches?
http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/
You could also try using apache to serve the iso over HTTP to see if
SCP is the bottleneck.
Also I think IPoIB should be able to use a much larger MTU. It may
help for large files.
Do this on both machines: ifconfig ib0 mtu 65520
To benchmark the raw infiniband performance see the man pages for
ib_read_bw and ib_write_bw
Erik
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Jagga Soorma <jagga13 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have setup a new cluster with a infiniband interconnect and I am a bit confused with the performance I am getting as far as transfer rates. Is there something that I am missing here? Shouldn't the transfer rate over the ib interface be much faster and not the same compared with the 1G (bonded mode=6) interface?
>
> (I am new to infiniband but this does not seem right. My routing is also setup correctly. Not sure what I might be missing here):
>
> --
> hpc101:/var/tmp # time scp SLES-11-DVD-x86_64-GM-DVD1.iso root at hpc103:/var/tmp/
> SLES-11-DVD-x86_64-GM-DVD1.iso 100% 2749MB 62.5MB/s 00:44
>
> real 0m43.882s
> user 0m29.482s
> sys 0m6.736s
>
> hpc101:/var/tmp # time scp SLES-11-DVD-x86_64-GM-DVD1.iso root at hpc103-ib:/var/tmp/
> SLES-11-DVD-x86_64-GM-DVD1.iso 100% 2749MB 80.9MB/s 00:34
>
> real 0m35.757s
> user 0m24.498s
> sys 0m6.292s
>
> hpc101:/var/tmp # netstat -rn
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
> 10.0.250.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ib0
> 128.137.126.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 bond0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
> 0.0.0.0 128.137.126.253 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 bond0
>
> hpc101:/var/tmp # ifconfig ib0
> ib0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 80-00-00-48-FE-80-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
> inet addr:10.0.250.5 Bcast:10.0.250.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> inet6 addr: fe80::223:7dff:ff93:bf4d/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:2044 Metric:1
> RX packets:493685 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:890402 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:256
> RX bytes:22848079 (21.7 Mb) TX bytes:7349365631 (7008.9 Mb)
> --
>
> Thanks in advance for your assistance.
>
> Regards,
> -J
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list