[Lustre-discuss] 1.8.2 Patchless Client
Brian J. Murrell
Brian.Murrell at Sun.COM
Tue Feb 16 08:42:05 PST 2010
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 11:28 -0500, CHU, STEPHEN H (ATTSI) wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi,
> · Server kickstarted with RHEL 5.3
So what is the actual version of the kernel you are running?
> · Installed
> lustre-client-1.8.2-2.6.18_164.11.1.el5_lustre.1.8.2.x86_64.rpm
>
> · Installed
> lustre-client-modules-1.8.2-2.6.18_164.11.1.el5_lustre.1.8.2.x86_64.rpm
...
> · Performed “rsync –
> alP /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5
What was the purpose of this? Generally speaking modules from one
kernel are not usable in other kernels. I assume since you installed
lustre-client-modules-1.8.2-2.6.18_164.11.1.el5_lustre.1.8.2.x86_64.rpm
that you are using the RH kernel versioned 2.6.18_164.11.1.el5, yes?
> Feb 16 16:20:43 bg8mo33sn kernel: ko2iblnd: disagrees about version of
> symbol ib_destroy_fmr_pool
You have a mismatch between the lustre modules you are using and the
kernel.
> · In 1.8.1.1 there was
> kernel-ib-1.4.2-2.6.18_128.7.1.el5.x86_64.rpm. No problem with
> 1.8.1.1.
Right. This was OFED 1.4.2 from the OFA.
> · In 1.8.2 there is no specific RPM to handle IB? Using stocked
> openib from RHEL worked for patched kernel installation.
Yes, in 1.8.2 we are using the OFED stack as shipped by RedHat which is
a 1.4[.1rc3 IIRC] stack.
b.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20100216/426b323e/attachment.pgp>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list