[Lustre-discuss] Not updated mtime after editted

Andreas Dilger adilger at sun.com
Thu Feb 25 22:37:45 PST 2010


On 2010-02-25, at 22:52, Satoshi Isono wrote:
> Thank you for your opinion.
> You means I should do version up on client. Does it mean from 1.6.5
> to 1.6.6? By which version is it fixed?

I would suggest 1.8.2, which is the most recent release.

> And could you do test using my script and report me with output?

sh check.sh
## START ORIGINAL TIME STAMP
mv_test.txt     277980  2010-02-25 23:34:11.000000000
mv_test.txt.org 279316  2010-02-25 23:34:11.000000000
## REVISE mv_test.txt
## CHECK TIME STAMP
mv_test.txt     277980  2010-02-25 23:34:48.000000000
mv_test.txt.org 279316  2010-02-25 23:34:11.000000000

You are free to look through the lustre/ChangeLog to see which bug(s)  
contained fixes for this problem, but the above shows it is at least  
fixed in 1.8.2.


> At 10/02/26(金)13:25, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> On 2010-02-25, at 20:17, Satoshi Isono wrote:
>>> I got the strange output on mtime information. Does anyone have such
>>> experiences?  Could you try to do this test, please?
>>> My Lustre environment is that client: 1.6.5.1-2.6.18_53.1.6.el5 and
>>> OSS: 1.6.6.-2.6.18_92.1.10.el5.
>>
>>
>> I suggest that you upgrade to a newer version of Lustre.  There  
>> were a
>> number of mtime fixes, along with hundreds of other bug fixes since
>> 1.6.5.
>>
>> Cheers, Andreas
>> --
>> Andreas Dilger
>> Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
>> Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss


Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.




More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list