[Lustre-discuss] ras_stride_increase_window() ASSERTION failed

Christopher J.Walker C.J.Walker at qmul.ac.uk
Fri Jun 18 13:12:12 PDT 2010


Christopher J.Walker wrote:
> Tom.Wang wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> you need the patch in bug 17197, attachment
>>
>> https://bugzilla.lustre.org/attachment.cgi?id=28672
>>
>> and probably also the patch in
>>
>> https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22385
>>
> 
> Thanks for the very quick reply.
> 
> I've recompiled the patchless client with both these patches and have 
> installed it on our machines. I've been running a test for the last 6 
> hours, and initial signs are very good - no repeat of the error message 
> on any of the machines.
> 

I subsequently upgraded to 1.8.3 on the clients. Whilst I didn't see 
problems, one of the users is complaining about poor performance (it's 
possible this has other causes, but the timing is suspicious).

Both  patches are labelled  "johann: landed1.8.3+"

I'm confused about whether this means the bugs are fixed in 1.8.3 or not.

Bug 22385 is mentioned in the changelog as being fixed (and attempting 
to apply the patch causes a reject).

Bug 17197 isn't mentioned in the changelog, and applying the patch 
mentioned:
https://bugzilla.lustre.org/attachment.cgi?id=28672
results in 2 hunks reversed and 3 applied.

Should I downgrade to my 1.8.2 version? Apply the remaining 3 hunks for 
bug 17197 or something else?

Thanks again,

Chris

> Chris
> 
>> Thanks
>> WangDi
>>
>>
>> Christopher J. Walker wrote:
>>> I see the following error in the logs on some of my lustre clients:
>>>
>>>     Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel: LustreError:        
>>> 18750:0:(rw.c:1948:ras_stride_increase_window())
>>>     ASSERTION(ras->ras_window_
>>>     start + ras->ras_window_len >= ras->ras_stride_offset) failed:
>>>     window_start 1792, window_len 0 stride_offset 2017
>>>
>>> Several processes seem to be blocking on this machine in state DN.
>>>
>>> Is this a known issue? I've looked in bugzilla and not found anything 
>>> obvious (but this is the first time I've looked in your bugzilla). 
>>> I've found 
>>> http://www.nersc.gov/hypermail/nersc-io/att-0612/summary.pdf and had a 
>>> quick flick through, but it refers to mpi-io, which we are not doing, 
>>> and a 1.6 kernel, whereas we are running 1.8.
>>>
>>> I'm running 1.8.2 servers (downloaded from Sun/Oracle), and 1.8.2 
>>> clients compiled from source on a Scientific Linux 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 
>>> kernel.
>>>
>>>  /var/log/messages says:
>>>
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel: LustreError: 
>>>> 18750:0:(rw.c:1948:ras_stride_increase_window()) 
>>>> ASSERTION(ras->ras_window_
>>>> start + ras->ras_window_len >= ras->ras_stride_offset) failed: 
>>>> window_start 1792, window_len 0 stride_offset 2017
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel: LustreError: 
>>>> 18750:0:(rw.c:1948:ras_stride_increase_window()) LBUG
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel: Pid: 18750, comm: athena.py
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel: Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel: Call Trace:
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff8844d6a1>] 
>>>> libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x51/0x60 [libcfs]
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff8844dbda>] 
>>>> lbug_with_loc+0x7a/0xd0 [libcfs]
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff8878d63f>] 
>>>> ll_readpage+0x129f/0x1e40 [lustre]
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff8000c707>] 
>>>> add_to_page_cache+0xaa/0xc1
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff8000c2f5>] 
>>>> do_generic_mapping_read+0x208/0x354
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff8000d0e0>] 
>>>> file_read_actor+0x0/0x159
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff8000c58d>] 
>>>> __generic_file_aio_read+0x14c/0x198
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff800c5d8f>] 
>>>> generic_file_readv+0x8f/0xa8
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff800a0307>] 
>>>> autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff8879a427>] 
>>>> our_vma+0x117/0x1d0 [lustre]
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff8000b984>] 
>>>> touch_atime+0x67/0xaa
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff8875f65b>] 
>>>> ll_file_readv+0x1e4b/0x2130 [lustre]
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff8875f95a>] 
>>>> ll_file_read+0x1a/0x20 [lustre]
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff8000b695>] vfs_read+0xcb/0x171
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff80011b60>] sys_read+0x45/0x6e
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel:  [<ffffffff8006149d>] 
>>>> sysenter_do_call+0x1e/0x76
>>>> Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel: Mar 29 20:58:43 cn507 kernel: 
>>>> LustreError: dumping log to /tmp/lustre-log.1269892723.18750
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Chris
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss




More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list