[Lustre-discuss] File access quetsion

[Ms. Megan Larko]

Ooops!   Apologies to all, especially Robin.  My bad.

megan

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Kevin Van Maren
<kevin.van.maren at oracle.com> wrote:
> Except that in this case, Robin is a "he".
>
>
> Ms. Megan Larko wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm following-up on my own question on 0100 file access as initially
>> appeared in Lustre-discuss Digest, Vol 53, Issue 3.
>>
>> Having a legitimate need for some execute-only programs to run on the
>> cluster system, we noted the behavior that a file 0100 did execute on
>> a non-Lustre (ext3) file system but did not execute (permission
>> denied) on a Lustre 1.6.7.2_3-2.6.2.16.60_0.42.9  (SLES10SP2 kernel
>> 2.6.16.60-0.42.9-smp).     Robin Humble filed bug number 22376 on 16
>> March 2010 regarding Lustre 1.8.2 for the same behavior.   NOTE:
>> RHumble comment #2 stated that the "permission denied" error did not
>> occur for her on her 2.6.18-128 kernel with Lustre version 1.6.7.2!
>>
>> The Lustre Bugzilla for 22376 reports that the issue is fixed in 1.8.3
>> and also in the initial 2.0.0 versions of Lustre.  As RHumble did not
>> have the same behavior in Lustre 1.6..7.2, there were no references to
>> any changes to that line.
>>
>> More reason to upgrade the Lustre system.
>>
>> Cheers!
>> megan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>>
>
>