[Lustre-discuss] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: modprobe/6024

[Andreas Dilger]

On 2010-03-18, at 03:44, Gregory Matthews wrote:
> thanks for the advice. I've compiled new lustre packages with the
> suggested fix and am currently running racer. So far, the above bug  
> has
> not reappeared...  In the meantime, lustre just got
> more compatible with the preempt kernel. Will this fix make it into
> mainline?


I've submitted bug 22409 with this patch, though I've updated the  
comment.  I can't say for sure which release it will be in, but I  
don't see a big barrier to accepting it in short order.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.