[Lustre-discuss] Bug 20153 - o2ib configuration issues with IB bonding

CHU, STEPHEN H (ATTSI) sc1680 at att.com
Tue Nov 9 05:47:39 PST 2010


Kevin,

Thanks for the update. Since our planned implementation is targeted for
our production architecture, we will wait for the patch to land on an
official release. We are currently running 1.8.1.1 on all servers and
clients.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Van Maren [mailto:kevin.van.maren at oracle.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 4:04 PM
To: CHU, STEPHEN H (ATTSI)
Cc: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Bug 20153 - o2ib configuration issues with
IB bonding

AFAIK, it will not be in 1.8.5.

While UNSUPORTED, you can pull the bonding-related patches from 
bugzilla, or from git:

To get (old) versions of the patches (should work with OFED 
1.4.1/1.4.2), try:

# git branch LOCAL-TEST v1_8_4
Note that you could instead try v1_8_5_RC3 if you wanted

# git checkout LOCAL-TEST
# git cherry-pick c4495e86685937f1fc17cd60baeda2360e0ad1b2
# git cherry-pick b9a4be24c31ee7c4c09638a9988d107172ab5fe8
# git cherry-pick dbe9bd661b8207c8206120d05fbca712fac7859e
(the first one is only so that the later cherry-pick merges
automatically).

Do note that even if only the servers are bonded, the _clients_ also 
need these patches.

Kevin


CHU, STEPHEN H (ATTSI) wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>  
>
> We planned to use IB bonding mode 1 active/passive on the MDS/MGSs and

> OSSs for interconnectivity.
>
>  
>
> Does anyone know if the patch for this bug is being planned for a 
> particular upcoming release? 1.8.5? 2.0.1?
>
>  
>
> https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20153
>
>  
>
> Thanks.
>
>  
>
> */Steve/*
>
>  
>
> */Stephen Chu/*
>
> *AT&T Labs CSO*
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>   




More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list