[Lustre-discuss] controlling which eth interface lustre uses

[Brian J. Murrell]

On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 10:29 -0400, Brock Palen wrote: 
> 
> We could do this, the 10Gb drivers have been such a pain for us we wanted to have a 'back door' management network to get to the box should we have issues with the 10Gb driver.

If you really do want two separate networks, one for Lustre and one for
management, they why not configure them as separate networks with
different subnets?  Anything else is just going to confuse the routing
engine.

I think "at best" two interfaces on the same subnet is going to cause
indeterminate behaviour.

b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20101021/5b8a6e7b/attachment.pgp>