[Lustre-discuss] Lustre client error

Bob Ball ball at umich.edu
Tue Feb 15 11:04:24 PST 2011


You can deactivate it on the MDT, that will make it RO, but leave it 
alone on the clients so they can still access files from it.

bob

On 2/15/2011 1:57 PM, Jagga Soorma wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> One of my clients got a hung lustre mount this morning and I saw the 
> following errors in my logs:
>
> --
> ..snip..
> Feb 15 09:38:07 reshpc116 kernel: LustreError: 11-0: an error occurred 
> while communicating with 10.0.250.47 at o2ib3. The ost_write operation 
> failed with -28
> Feb 15 09:38:07 reshpc116 kernel: LustreError: Skipped 4755836 
> previous similar messages
> Feb 15 09:48:07 reshpc116 kernel: LustreError: 11-0: an error occurred 
> while communicating with 10.0.250.47 at o2ib3. The ost_write operation 
> failed with -28
> Feb 15 09:48:07 reshpc116 kernel: LustreError: Skipped 4649141 
> previous similar messages
> Feb 15 10:16:54 reshpc116 kernel: Lustre: 
> 6254:0:(client.c:1476:ptlrpc_expire_one_request()) @@@ Request 
> x1360125198261945 sent from reshpcfs-OST0005-osc-ffff8830175c8400 to 
> NID 10.0.250.47 at o2ib3 1344s ago has timed out (1344s prior to deadline).
> Feb 15 10:16:54 reshpc116 kernel: Lustre: 
> reshpcfs-OST0005-osc-ffff8830175c8400: Connection to service 
> reshpcfs-OST0005 via nid 10.0.250.47 at o2ib3 was lost; in progress 
> operations using this service will wait for recovery to complete.
> Feb 15 10:16:54 reshpc116 kernel: LustreError: 11-0: an error occurred 
> while communicating with 10.0.250.47 at o2ib3. The ost_connect operation 
> failed with -16
> Feb 15 10:16:54 reshpc116 kernel: LustreError: Skipped 2888779 
> previous similar messages
> Feb 15 10:16:55 reshpc116 kernel: Lustre: 
> 6254:0:(client.c:1476:ptlrpc_expire_one_request()) @@@ Request 
> x1360125198261947 sent from reshpcfs-OST0005-osc-ffff8830175c8400 to 
> NID 10.0.250.47 at o2ib3 1344s ago has timed out (1344s prior to deadline).
> Feb 15 10:18:11 reshpc116 kernel: LustreError: 11-0: an error occurred 
> while communicating with 10.0.250.47 at o2ib3. The ost_connect operation 
> failed with -16
> Feb 15 10:18:11 reshpc116 kernel: LustreError: Skipped 10 previous 
> similar messages
> Feb 15 10:20:45 reshpc116 kernel: LustreError: 11-0: an error occurred 
> while communicating with 10.0.250.47 at o2ib3. The ost_connect operation 
> failed with -16
> Feb 15 10:20:45 reshpc116 kernel: LustreError: Skipped 21 previous 
> similar messages
> Feb 15 10:25:46 reshpc116 kernel: LustreError: 11-0: an error occurred 
> while communicating with 10.0.250.47 at o2ib3. The ost_connect operation 
> failed with -16
> Feb 15 10:25:46 reshpc116 kernel: LustreError: Skipped 42 previous 
> similar messages
> Feb 15 10:31:43 reshpc116 kernel: Lustre: 
> reshpcfs-OST0005-osc-ffff8830175c8400: Connection restored to service 
> reshpcfs-OST0005 using nid 10.0.250.47 at o2ib3.
> --
>
> Due to disk space issues on my lustre filesystem one of the OST's were 
> full and I deactivated that OST this morning.  I thought that 
> operation just puts it in a read only state and that clients can still 
> access the data from that OST.  After activating this OST again the 
> client connected again and was okay after this.  How else would you 
> deal with a OST that is close to 100% full?  Is it okay to leave the 
> OST active and the clients will know not to write data to that OST?
>
> Thanks,
> -J
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20110215/f9918291/attachment.htm>


More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list