[Lustre-discuss] Installing Lustre client on 2.6.18-194 kernel

Albert Everett aeeverett at ualr.edu
Mon Feb 21 10:22:57 PST 2011


Excellent - thanks for letting us know.

Thanks again to Tim Carlson for his OFED wiki, and to Terascala for  
help with building up the lustre client.

Albert

On Feb 21, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

> Thanks Albert, I really appreciate you...
> Now everything is working...
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Albert Everett <aeeverett at ualr.edu>  
> wrote:
> Here's what's in our /etc/modprobe.conf related to IB and lustre:
>
> options ib_mthca msi_x=1
> options lnet networks=o2ib0(ib0)
> options ko2iblnd ipif_name=ib0
>
> We have Mellanox Infinihost (III?) DDR cards and IPs defined for them.
>
> $ /sbin/ifconfig ib0
> ib0       Link encap:InfiniBand  HWaddr 80:00:04:04:FE: 
> 80:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
>          inet addr:192.168.2.1  Bcast:192.168.2.255  Mask: 
> 255.255.255.0
>          inet6 addr: fe80::202:c902:29:b341/64 Scope:Link
>          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:65520  Metric:1
>          RX packets:1719 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>          TX packets:30 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>          collisions:0 txqueuelen:256
>          RX bytes:96564 (94.3 KiB)  TX bytes:2420 (2.3 KiB)
>
> Albert
>
>
> On Feb 20, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:
>
> I have done what you said. I will test my client to the server  
> tomorrow. but would you tell me the tweaks you have done on /etc/ 
> modprobe.conf ?
>
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Albert Everett <aeeverett at ualr.edu>  
> wrote:
> For lustre client, we did not need to alter our kernel at all. We  
> just made and installed lustre-1.8.5 and lustre-modules-1.8.5 rpms. / 
> etc/modprobe.conf needs a tweak.
>
> For lustre server, I believe you will need to deal with a patched  
> kernel. We have not been down this road yet since our vendor  
> includes lustre server software with their hardware.
>
> Albert
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:
>
> Hi Albert,
> It seems that you have made a new kernel in order to run lustre on  
> clients. Am I right?
> I don't want to change kernel on clients at all...
>
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Albert Everett <aeeverett at ualr.edu>  
> wrote:
> Our kernel is also 2.6.18_194.17.4.el5.
>
> We installed OFED 1.5.2 from source, following this guide:
>
>  https://wiki.rocksclusters.org/wiki/index.php/Install_OFED_1.5.x_on_a_Rocks_5.3_cluster
>
> ... which left us, among other things, a folder /usr/src/ofa_kernel.
>
> Lustre on the server side is handled by our vendor, so all we needed  
> to worry about is the client.
>
> To build a lustre client, we then installed lustre-1.8.5.tar.gz from  
> source, not from rpms. Our first compile produced the error you show  
> below.
> # ./configure --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
> # make rpms
>
> To get the lustre installation to use our new OFED, we tried this  
> and it worked.
>
> # ./configure --with-o2ib=/usr/src/ofa_kernel --with-linux=/lib/ 
> modules/`uname -r`/build
> # make rpms
>
> RPMs showed up in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64, and we are using  
> lustre-1.8.5*.rpm and lustre-modules-*.rpm on our client machines.
>
> Albert
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:34 AM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have installed lustre client packages on a client node. But it  
> doesn't mount the lustre file system from lustre server. It gets the  
> following famous error:
>
> $ mount -t lustre 192.168.0.1:/lustre /mnt/lustre
> mount.lustre: mount 172.16.113.232:/lustre at /mnt/lustre failed: No  
> such device
> Are the lustre modules loaded?
> Check /etc/modprobe.conf and /proc/filesystems
> Note 'alias lustre llite' should be removed from modprobe.conf
>
>
> As I was searching through the mailing list, I have noticed that  
> lustre.ko should be present in this directory:
> /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.17.4.el5/kernel/fs/lustre/lustre.ko
>
> My current kernel is 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5. but lustre.ko is in  
> 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 instead. So I guessed that this may be the  
> source of problem.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
>




More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list