[Lustre-discuss] Compiling Lustre 2 on SLES10

[Alvaro Aguilera]

It'd be a pity if eventually only OEL gets supported!

Anyways, thanks for the responses!

Regards,
Alvaro.

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Ken Hornstein <kenh at cmf.nrl.navy.mil>wrote:

> >Yes, that is what Oracle had announced in the roadmap.
> >
> >SLES servers are still supported on Lustre 1.8.x, but Oracle announced
> >plans to not support them with Lustre 2.x.  Given the similarities
> >between the RHEL6 and SLES11 kernels, I am sure someone could bring SLES
> >support back when RHEL6 is supported, if enough people were willing to
> >pay for it.
>
> If anyone cares ...
>
> I did the mechanics of getting Lustre 2.0.0.1 compiled and running
> under SLES11SP1 (I first tried just SLES11, but it was too hard;
> the kernel was just too old to make bringing the ext4 patches forward
> feasible, at least for me).  I have it working right now in a small
> test filesystem I use for non-production work.  It was a pain (the
> major problems were in ldiskfs), but MOST of the pieces were there;
> it was mostly a matter of shuffling things around and figuring out
> what went where (I don't want to say it was EASY; it took a while.
> But it wouldn't call it _hard_; it was mostly annoying, especially
> since I wasn't that familiar at the time with ext4/ldiskfs).
>
> I've been thinking of working with the open-source Lustre groups to get
> this into a future release; perhaps I'll talk with some of them at the
> upcoming LUG.
>
> --Ken
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20110221/2c4d8cc1/attachment.htm>