[Lustre-discuss] MDT raid parameters, multiple MGSes
Ben Evans
Ben.Evans at terascala.com
Fri Jan 21 05:55:21 PST 2011
In our lab, we've never had a problem with simply having 1 MGS per filesystem. Mountpoints will be unique for all of them, but functionally it works just fine.
-Ben Evans
-----Original Message-----
From: lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of Thomas Roth
Sent: Fri 1/21/2011 6:43 AM
To: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
Subject: [Lustre-discuss] MDT raid parameters, multiple MGSes
Hi all,
we have gotten new MDS hardware, and I've got two questions:
What are the recommendations for the RAID configuration and formatting
options?
I was following the recent discussion about these aspects on an OST:
chunk size, strip size, stride-size, stripe-width etc. in the light of
the 1MB chunks of Lustre ... So what about the MDT? I will have a RAID
10 that consists of 11 RAID-1 pairs striped over. giving me roughly 3TB
of space. What would be the correct value for <insert your favorite
term>, the amount of data written to one disk before proceeding to the
next disk?
Secondly, it is not yet decided whether we wouldn't use this hardware to
set up a second Lustre cluster. The manual recommends to have only one
MGS per site, but doesn't elaborate: what would be the drawback of
having two MGSes, two different network addresses the clients have to
connect to to mount the Lustres?
I know that it didn't work in Lustre 1.6.3 ;-) and there are no apparent
issues when connecting a Lustre client to a test cluster now (version
1.8.4), but what about production?
Cheers,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20110121/37ba3c4f/attachment.htm>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list