[Lustre-discuss] lustre and software RAID

Samuel Aparicio saparicio at bccrc.ca
Tue Jan 25 16:35:27 PST 2011


it worked ... but the issue went away as well.

Professor Samuel Aparicio BM BCh PhD FRCPath
Nan and Lorraine Robertson Chair UBC/BC Cancer Agency
675 West 10th, Vancouver V5Z 1L3, Canada.
office: +1 604 675 8200 cellphone: +1 604 762 5178: lab website http://molonc.bccrc.ca

PLEASE SUPPORT MY FUNDRAISING FOR THE RIDE TO SEATTLE AND THE WEEKEND TO END WOMENS CANCERS. YOU CAN DONATE AT THE LINKS BELOW

Ride to Seattle Fundraiser

Weekend to End Womens Cancers



On Jan 25, 2011, at 6:39 AM, Kevin Van Maren wrote:

> Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> On 2011-01-21, at 14:50, Samuel Aparicio wrote:
>> 
>>> modinfo reports as follows. seems like the ext4 modules.
>>> the odd thing is that the format works when the disk array is already presented as a raid set, rather than making the raidset with mdadm on the OSS
>>> 
>>> --------
>>> filename:       /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.3.1.el5_lustre.1.8.4/updates/kernel/fs/lustre-ldiskfs/ldiskfs.ko
>>> description:    Fourth Extended Filesystem
>>> ---------
>>> 
>> 
>> After the filesystem is formatted with mkfs.lustre, you should be able to mount it directly with "mount -t ext4 /dev/md??? /mnt" and see a few files in it.
>> 
> 
> Last time I tried it (with Lustre 1.8.5), that didn't work for me (see 
> Bug 24398), although I left out "-t ext4" it tried to mount as ext4.  
> "mount -t ldiskfs ..." should work
> 
> Kevin
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20110125/bed55b32/attachment.htm>


More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list