[Lustre-discuss] RAID cards - what works well with Lustre?
Daire Byrne
daire.byrne at gmail.com
Tue Jul 5 09:33:22 PDT 2011
Hi,
I have been testing some LSI 9260 RAID cards for use with Lustre v1.8.6 but
have found that the "megaraid_sas" driver is not really able to facilitate
the 1MB full stripe IOs that Lustre likes. This topic has also come up
recently in the following two email threads:
http://groups.google.com/group/lustre-discuss-list/browse_thread/thread/65a1fdc312b0eccb#
http://groups.google.com/group/lustre-discuss-list/browse_thread/thread/fcf39d85b7e945ab
I was able to up the max_hw_sectors_kb -> 1024 by setting the "max_sectors"
megaraid_sas module option but found that the IOs were still being pretty
fragmented:
disk I/O size ios % cum % | ios % cum %
4K: 3060 0 0 | 2611 0 0
8K: 3261 0 0 | 2664 0 0
16K: 6408 0 1 | 5296 0 1
32K: 13025 1 2 | 10692 1 2
64K: 48397 4 6 | 26417 2 4
128K: 50166 4 10 | 42218 4 9
256K: 113124 9 20 | 86516 8 17
512K: 677242 57 78 | 448231 45 63
1M: 254195 21 100 | 355804 36 100
So next I looked at the sg_tablesize and found it was being set to "80" by
the driver (which queries the firmware). I tried to hack the driver and
increase this value but bad things happened and so it looks like it is a
genuine hardware limit with these cards.
The overall throughput isn't exactly terrible because the
RAID write-back cache does a reasonable job but I suspect it could be
better, e.g.
ost 3 sz 201326592K rsz 1024K obj 192 thr 192 write 1100.52 [ 231.75,
529.96] read 940.26 [ 275.70, 357.60]
ost 3 sz 201326592K rsz 1024K obj 192 thr 384 write 1112.19 [ 184.80,
546.43] read 1169.20 [ 337.63, 462.52]
ost 3 sz 201326592K rsz 1024K obj 192 thr 768 write 1217.79 [ 219.77,
665.32] read 1532.47 [ 403.58, 552.43]
ost 3 sz 201326592K rsz 1024K obj 384 thr 384 write 920.87 [ 171.82,
466.77] read 901.03 [ 257.73, 372.87]
ost 3 sz 201326592K rsz 1024K obj 384 thr 768 write 1058.11 [ 166.83,
681.25] read 1309.63 [ 346.64, 484.51]
All of this brings me to my main question - what internal cards have people
here used which work well with Lustre? 3ware, Areca or other models of LSI?
Cheers,
Daire
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20110705/a9190b91/attachment.htm>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list