[Lustre-discuss] Fwd: Lustre performance issue (obdfilter_survey

lior amar liororama at gmail.com
Wed Jul 6 22:12:52 PDT 2011


Hi,

First, thanks for your quick replay.


On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Cliff White <cliffw at whamcloud.com> wrote:

> The case=network part of obdfilter_survey has really been replaced by
> lnet_selftest.
> I don't think it's been maintained in awhile.
>
> It would be best to repeat the network-only test with lnet_selftest, this
> is likely an issue with
> the script.
> cliffw
>
>
I used the lnet self test and got  reasonable results
------------------
Numbers obtained with concurrency = 1

 [LNet Rates of servers]
 [R] Avg: 3556     RPC/s Min: 3556     RPC/s Max: 3556     RPC/s
 [W] Avg: 4742     RPC/s Min: 4742     RPC/s Max: 4742     RPC/s
 [LNet Bandwidth of servers]
 [R] Avg: 1185.72  MB/s  Min: 1185.72  MB/s  Max: 1185.72  MB/s
 [W] Avg: 1185.72  MB/s  Min: 1185.72  MB/s  Max: 1185.72  MB/s
-------------------

The question is what is the meaning of the concurrency=1 flag. Does it mean
a single thread at the client
or a sigle thread per core??

My problem is with the case=netdisk that gives me low performance for single
thread (the dd case).
(as well as with the ost_survey case).

Is the case=netdisk a valid test ??

I am trying to isolate the problem and the case=netdisk alows me to avoid
accessing the mds (right?)

Any Idea??


----------------------oo--o(:-:)o--oo----------------
Lior Amar, Ph.D.
Cluster Logic Ltd --> The Art of HPC
www.clusterlogic.net
----------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20110707/ba8dc09f/attachment.htm>


More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list