[Lustre-discuss] bug or transport problem?

Daniel Mayfield dmayfield at rgmadvisors.com
Thu Mar 10 11:12:06 PST 2011


So if I move my clients to 1.8.5, I should be ok?  The servers are running the 2.6.18 kernel distributed with 2.0.

Daniel


On Mar 10, 2011, at 11:19, Johann Lombardi <johann at whamcloud.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:02:03AM -0600, Daniel Mayfield wrote:
>> Pid: 12935, comm: ptlrpcd-brw Not tainted 2.6.32.28-2.rgm #1 PowerEdge R610
>                    ^^^^^^^^^^^             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Please note that 2.0 does not support 2.6.32 kernels. 2.1 will.
> 
>> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811ebf93>]  [<ffffffff811ebf93>] sg_next+0x3/0x30
>> Call Trace:
>> [<ffffffffa094dc3e>] ? kiblnd_map_tx+0x1be/0x430 [ko2iblnd]
>> [<ffffffffa094e8a1>] ? kiblnd_queue_tx_locked+0x91/0x2b0 [ko2iblnd]
> 
> This is a bug introduced by one of the patch from bug 21951 (attachment 29114).
> This patch was then reverted from both b1_8 (see 23123) and master (see 23332),
> but it is unfortunately included in 2.0.0.
> 
> Cheers,
> Johann


---------------------------------------------------------------
This email, along with any attachments, is confidential. If you 
believe you received this message in error, please contact the 
sender immediately and delete all copies of the message.  
Thank you.




More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list