[Lustre-discuss] Lustre client question

Zachary Beebleson zbeeble at math.uchicago.edu
Fri May 13 10:39:53 PDT 2011


We recently had two raid rebuilds on a couple storage targets that did not go 
according to plan. The cards reported a successful rebuild in each case, but 
ldiskfs errors started showing up on the associated OSSs and the effected OSTs 
were  remounted read-only. We are planning to migrate off the data, but we've 
noticed that some clients are getting i/o errors, while others are not. As an 
example, a file that has a stripe on at least one affected OST could not be 
read on one client, i.e. I received a read-error trying to access it, while it 
was perfectly readable and apparently uncorrupted on another (I am able to 
migrate the file to healthy OSTs by copying to a new file name). The clients 
with the i/o problem see inactive devices corresponding to the read-only OSTs 
when I issue a 'lfs df', while the others without the i/o problems report the 
targets as normal. Is it just that many clients are not aware of an OST problem 
yet? I need clients with minimal I/O disruptions in order to migrate as much 
data off as possible.

A client reboot appears to awaken them to the fact that there are problems with 
the OSTs. However, I need them to be able to read the data in order to migrate 
it off. Is there a way to reconnect the clients to the problematic OSTs?

We have dd-ed copies of the OSTs to try e2fsck against them, but the results 
were not promising. The check aborted with:

------
Resize inode (re)creation failed: A block group is missing an inode 
table.Continue? yes

ext2fs_read_inode: A block group is missing an inode table while reading inode 
7 in recreate inode
e2fsck: aborted
------

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Zach



More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list