[Lustre-discuss] Lustre v2.1 RHEL 6.1 build does not work

Sun Oct 2 13:31:21 PDT 2011

Thanks a lot, the work around works.

-Jon.

On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Oleg Drokin <green at whamcloud.com> wrote:

> Hello!
>
>    Last time I hit this (some years ago), a simple touch
> ldiskfs/Module.symvers helped. I don't remember what the issue was or how it
> was properly fixed, though.
>
> Bye,
>     Oleg
> On Oct 2, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Jon Zhu wrote:
>
> > Hi, Oleg
> >
> > I encountered the following error while building Lustre 2.1 release on
> Redhat 2.1, do you have any idea on this error?
> >
> > make[1]: *** No rule to make target
> `/build/lustre-release/ldiskfs/Module.symvers', needed by `Module.symvers'.
>  Stop.
> >
> >
> > Full build log :
> > ....
> > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars
> > Processing files: lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.noarch
> > Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.IOpHyP
> > + umask 022
> > + cd /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILD
> > + cd lustre-iokit-1.2
> > +
> DOCDIR=/build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2
> > + export DOCDIR
> > + rm -rf
> /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2
> > + /bin/mkdir -p
> /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2
> > + cp -pr obdfilter-survey/README.obdfilter-survey
> /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2
> > + cp -pr ior-survey/README.ior-survey
> /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2
> > + cp -pr ost-survey/README.ost-survey
> /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2
> > + cp -pr sgpdd-survey/README.sgpdd-survey
> /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2
> > + cp -pr stats-collect/README.lstats.sh/build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2
> > + exit 0
> > Provides: lustre-iokit = 1.2
> > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
> > Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl perl(File::Path)
> perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Getopt::Std) perl(POSIX)
> > Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
> /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64
> > Wrote: /build/kernel/rpmbuild/SRPMS/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.src.rpm
> > Wrote:
> /build/kernel/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.noarch.rpm
> > Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0eXePd
> > + umask 022
> > + cd /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILD
> > + cd lustre-iokit-1.2
> > + /bin/rm -rf
> /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64
> > + exit 0
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/lustre-release/lustre-iokit'
> > Finished rpms in lustre-iokit
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/build/lustre-release'
> > make[1]: *** No rule to make target
> `/build/lustre-release/ldiskfs/Module.symvers', needed by `Module.symvers'.
>  Stop.
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/lustre-release'
> > make: *** [rpms] Error 2
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Jon.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Oleg Drokin <green at whamcloud.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> >   There is nothing special, same as rhel6.1:
> >   unpack the lustre source, run autogen.sh, run configure and provide the
> path to the linux kernel source for your distro (need to patch first too),
> make.
> >
> > Bye,
> >    Oleg
> > On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:21 PM, Jon Zhu wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Oleg
> > >
> > > Do we have a procedure on how to build v2.1 GA code on CentOS 5.6
> (xen)? On whamcloud wiki I can only find build v2.1 on RHEL 6.1 or build
> v1.8 on CentOS 5.6.
> > >
> > > BTW, congratulations on the 2.1 release!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Jon Zhu
> > > Sent from Google Mail
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Oleg Drokin <green at whamcloud.com>
> wrote:
> > > Hwllo~
> > >
> > > On Jun 23, 2011, at 9:51 PM, Jon Zhu wrote:
> > >
> > > > I still got some crash when further run some I/O test with the build,
> here's some system message containing call stack info maybe be useful to you
> to find the bug:
> > >
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: ------------[ cut here
> ]------------
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: WARNING: at
> kernel/sched.c:7087 __cond_resched_lock+0x8e/0xb0() (Not tainted)
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: Modules linked in: lustre(U)
> lov(U) osc(U) lquota(U) mdc(U) fid(U) fld(U) ksocklnd(U) ptlrpc(U)
> obdclass(U) lnet(U) lvfs(U) libcfs(U) ldiskfs(U) sha256_generic cryptd
> aes_x86_64 aes_generic cbc dm_crypt autofs4 ipv6 microcode xen_netfront ext4
> mbcache jbd2 xen_blkfront dm_mod [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: Pid: 1421, comm:
> mount.lustre Not tainted 2.6.32.lustre21 #6
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: Call Trace:
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff81069c37>] ?
> warn_slowpath_common+0x87/0xc0
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff81007671>] ?
> __raw_callee_save_xen_save_fl+0x11/0x1e
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff81069c8a>] ?
> warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff810654fe>] ?
> __cond_resched_lock+0x8e/0xb0
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff811a53b7>] ?
> shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree+0x187/0x340
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff811a55a6>] ?
> shrink_dcache_for_umount+0x36/0x60
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff8118f4ff>] ?
> generic_shutdown_super+0x1f/0xe0
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff8118f5f1>] ?
> kill_block_super+0x31/0x50
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff811906b5>] ?
> deactivate_super+0x85/0xa0
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff811ac5af>] ?
> mntput_no_expire+0xbf/0x110
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffffa0273f8e>] ?
> unlock_mntput+0x3e/0x60 [obdclass]
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffffa0277a98>] ?
> server_kernel_mount+0x268/0xe80 [obdclass]
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffffa0280d40>] ?
> lustre_fill_super+0x0/0x1290 [obdclass]
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffffa0279070>] ?
> lustre_init_lsi+0xd0/0x5b0 [obdclass]
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff810ac71d>] ?
> lock_release+0xed/0x220
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffffa0280fd0>] ?
> lustre_fill_super+0x290/0x1290 [obdclass]
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff8118ee20>] ?
> set_anon_super+0x0/0x110
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffffa0280d40>] ?
> lustre_fill_super+0x0/0x1290 [obdclass]
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff8119035f>] ?
> get_sb_nodev+0x5f/0xa0
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffffa0272885>] ?
> lustre_get_sb+0x25/0x30 [obdclass]
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff8118ffbb>] ?
> vfs_kern_mount+0x7b/0x1b0
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff81190162>] ?
> do_kern_mount+0x52/0x130
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff811ae647>] ?
> do_mount+0x2e7/0x870
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff811aec60>] ?
> sys_mount+0x90/0xe0
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff8100b132>] ?
> system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: ---[ end trace
> a8fb737c71bfba13 ]---
> > >
> > > This is not a crash, it's just a warning about scheduling in
> inappropriate context I guess, but the kernel will continue to work.
> > > Interesting that I have never seen anything like that in rhel5 xen
> kernels, perhaps it's something with rhel6.1 xen?
> > >
> > > Bye,
> > >    Oleg
> > > --
> > > Oleg Drokin
> > > Senior Software Engineer
> > > Whamcloud, Inc.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Oleg Drokin
> > Senior Software Engineer
> > Whamcloud, Inc.
> >
> >
>
> --
> Oleg Drokin
> Senior Software Engineer
> Whamcloud, Inc.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20111002/a0c92222/attachment.htm>