[Lustre-discuss] Slow lustre after NIS
    Donald J. Kolva 
    dkolva at atlab.com
       
    Mon Sep 12 07:21:55 PDT 2011
    
    
  
Lustre was as fast (or faster) than a local drive when security was handled by local nodes on a cluster.  Switching the cluster to NIS (and also switching the MDS to the same NIS server) seems to have made Lustre 5x slower.  Switching back to "local" security does not restore the speed.
Can Lustre work with NIS?  Does each OST need to be NIS or just the MDS?
Is there a good way to debug the performance of Lustre?  I've poured over the manual, but it doesn't seem clear on how to debug this performance problem.
Lustre over the 1 GB network is as slow as Infiniband.
Setup is on MDS, and three OST each running CentOS 5.5
Cluster is one headnode and 8 computenodes with RHEL 5.5
Thanks for any help!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20110912/a6c74aee/attachment.htm>
    
    
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list