[Lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.2 production experience

Wojciech Turek wjt27 at cam.ac.uk
Sat Jun 9 15:05:06 PDT 2012

Thanks for a quick reply Andreas. I slightly misunderstood the lustre
release process and thought that the next stable/production version is

I am then interested in the experience of people running Lustre 2.1



On 9 June 2012 21:52, Andreas Dilger <adilger at whamcloud.com> wrote:
> I think you'll find that there are not yet (m)any production deployments of 2.2. There are a number of production 2.1 deployments, and this is the current maintenance stream from Whamcloud.
> Cheers, Andreas
> On 2012-06-09, at 14:33, Wojciech Turek <wjt27 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>> I am building a 1.5PB storage system which will employ Lustre as the
>> main file system. The storage system will be extended at the later
>> stage beyond 2PB.  I am considering using Lustre 2.2 for production
>> environment. This Lustre storage system will replace our older 300TB
>> system which is currently running Lustre 1.8.8. I am quite happy with
>> lustre 1.8.8 however for the new system Lustre 2.2 seem to be a better
>> match.  The storage system will be attached to a university wide
>> cluster (800 nodes), hence there will be quite a large range of
>> applications using the filesystem. Could people with production
>> deployments of Lustre 2.2 share their experience please?
>> --
>> Wojciech Turek
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list