[Lustre-discuss] [wc-discuss] Seeking contributors for Lustre User Manual
Christopher J. Walker
C.J.Walker at qmul.ac.uk
Wed Nov 14 15:51:49 PST 2012
On 13/11/12 21:26, Ned Bass wrote:
> - A review process for proposed changes that assures a high standard of quality
That's important. I've spotted cases where it's clear there's an issue,
but am not sure what the correct answer is.
A quick way of reporting issues in the manual would be useful too -
whilst I did go to the effort of registering in order to submit typos,
that's rather heavyweight. Just being able to send an e-mail would be
easier - but it's true that someone needs to sort them.
More information about the lustre-discuss