[Lustre-discuss] mds backup question

Jason Brooks brookjas at ohsu.edu
Wed Sep 19 12:36:29 PDT 2012


Hello,

Now that the getfattr operation is done, here are the specs:

the mds filesystem (mounted as type ldiskfs) has 7.7 gigabytes in use.

however, the getfattr operation produced an ascii file that is 20 gigabytes in size.

is this reasonable?


On Sep 19, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Jason Brooks wrote:

Hello,

I am running a file-level backup of an 1.8 mds system.  At the moment, I am running the getfattr command as mentioned on page 15-3 in the lustre fs manual.  The biggest thing i a noticing, is that the attributes are as large or larger than the actual filesystem.  I expect that when converting bits to ascii data, the amount of space used will increase.  The question though is "how much"?  It doesn't seem reasonable for the bits to inflate THAT much.

--jason


Jason Brooks
971-238-3924
brookjas at ohsu.edu<mailto:brookjas at ohsu.edu>
Oregon Health Sciences University
Center for Spoken Language Understanding

_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Jason Brooks
971-238-3924
brookjas at ohsu.edu<mailto:brookjas at ohsu.edu>
Oregon Health Sciences University
Center for Spoken Language Understanding

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20120919/5a85193a/attachment.htm>


More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list