[Lustre-discuss] Quota not functioning on all OSTs
Colin Faber
colin_faber at xyratex.com
Wed Feb 27 17:53:10 PST 2013
Hi,
What version of lustre are you running?
-cf
Michael Losapio <mike.losapio at nyu.edu> wrote:
>Hey folks,
>
>I have a bit of an anomaly...
>
>Lustre quotas are only working on a portion of my OSTs despite having
>the correct parameters set...
>
>[root at balki ~]# lfs quota -u mjl19 -v /scratch
>Disk quotas for user mjl19 (uid 1552540):
> Filesystem kbytes quota limit grace files quota limit grace
> /scratch 3095592* 10 20 - 3 1000000 1001000 -
>scratch-MDT0000_UUID
> 264 - 1024 - 3 - 5120 -
>scratch-OST0000_UUID
> 0 - 1024 - - - - -
>scratch-OST0001_UUID
> 6936* - 1024 - - - - -
>scratch-OST0002_UUID
> 0 - 1024 - - - - -
>....
>scratch-OST001d_UUID
> 3095560 - 0 - - - - -
>scratch-OST001e_UUID
> 0 - 0 - - - - -
>....
>
>[root at oss2 ~]# tunefs.lustre --dryrun --param /dev/mapper/ost_scratch_29
>checking for existing Lustre data: found CONFIGS/mountdata
>Reading CONFIGS/mountdata
>
> Read previous values:
>Target: scratch-OST001d
>Index: 29
>Lustre FS: scratch
>Mount type: ldiskfs
>Flags: 0x1002
> (OST no_primnode )
>Persistent mount opts: errors=remount-ro,extents,mballoc,nodelalloc,nobarrier
>Parameters: mgsnode=10.0.1.240 at o2ib mgsnode=10.0.1.239 at o2ib
>failover.node=10.0.1.236 at o2ib failover.node=10.0.1.235 at o2ib
>ost.quota_type=ug
>
>I even tried to reset the user quota (thinking that perhaps this OSS
>was offline during the initial setting)... no change and this isn't an
>anomaly for the user but for all users on those OSTs
>
>Does this mean I have to run a lfs quotacheck across the entire
>filesystem? If yes, how dangerous is it to do on a live system?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Mike
>_______________________________________________
>Lustre-discuss mailing list
>Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20130227/8fa05da9/attachment.htm>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list