[Lustre-discuss] /etc/init.d/lnet

[Ned Bass]

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:30:51PM -0500, Mike Hanby wrote:
> Bleh, I'm getting a 404 error on that link.
> 
> Is there an updated link for the patch or a full copy of the patched script?

Sorry, there should be no trailing slash.

http://review.whamcloud.com/5478

Ned

> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> From: Andrus, Brian Contractor <bdandrus at nps.edu>
> Sent: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 14:11:38 +0000
> To: Ned Bass <bass6 at llnl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] /etc/init.d/lnet
> 
>     I have put the patch in place and so far it seems to be working!
> 
> 
>     Brian Andrus
>     ITACS/Research Computing
>     Naval Postgraduate School
>     Monterey, California
>     voice: 831-656-6238
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: Ned Bass [mailto:bass6 at llnl.gov]
>         Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 3:03 PM
>         To: Andrus, Brian Contractor
>         Cc: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>         Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] /etc/init.d/lnet
> 
>         Hi Brian,
> 
>         On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 05:37:42PM +0000, Andrus, Brian Contractor wrote:
> 
>             All,
> 
>             I am finding that on reboot, my client systems hang requiring a hard reset
> 
>         because of the lnet service.
> 
>             It doesn't unload all the modules in the proper order for me.
>             I get errors like module osc has non-zero count
> 
>             I do some hunting and see lov needs unloaded before osc I also find
>             fid and fld need unloaded before ptlrpc ofd needs unloaded before ost
> 
>             Sometimes others as well....
> 
>             Is there an updated lnet script available that is more complete? For the
> 
>         time, I have been modifying the stock one to include the 'missing' modules
>         for processing.
> 
>         There is a patch to improve the module unloading behavior here, but it is
>         not yet landed:
> 
>         http://review.whamcloud.com/5478/
> 
>         It would be valuable to know if the proposed changes fix your issue.
> 
>         Ned
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Lustre-discuss mailing list
>     Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>     http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
> 
> 

> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss