[Lustre-discuss] Lustre and ZFS notes available
scott.nolin at ssec.wisc.edu
Thu Aug 14 06:40:11 PDT 2014
Much of this information is notes and not in a finished format, so it's
a problem of how much time we have.
The other issue is contributing to the manual is somewhat cumbersome as
you have to submit patches -
The bar there is a bit higher - we have to be pretty confident the
information that's added is correct, know if it's just for some versions
of lustre, and so on. As opposed to simply "here are our notes that work
I will try to review what we have and if anything looks really incorrect
or missing in the lustre manual we will attempt to issue a patch.
I think in general the lustre manual is correct, but not always
sufficient. I think the process does make sure incorrect stuff doesn't
go in at least, but makes it hard to add information.
On 8/14/2014 6:13 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
> Hi Scott,
> Great job! Would you consider merging with the standard Lustre docs?
> On 12 August 2014 18:58, Scott Nolin <scott.nolin at ssec.wisc.edu
> <mailto:scott.nolin at ssec.wisc.edu>> wrote:
> At UW SSEC my group has been using Lustre for a few years, and
> recently Lustre with ZFS as the back end file system. We have found
> the Lustre community very open and helpful in sharing information.
> Specifically information from various LUG and LAD meetings and the
> mailing lists has been very helpful.
> With this in mind we would like to share some of our internal
> documentation and notes that may be useful to others. These are
> working notes, so not a complete guide.
> I want to be clear that the official Lustre documentation should be
> considered the correct reference material in general. But this
> information may be helpful for some -
> http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~__scottn/ <http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~scottn/>
> Topics that I think of particular interest may be lustre zfs install
> notes and JBOD monitoring.
> Scott Nolin
> UW SSEC
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org <mailto:Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6248 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the lustre-discuss