[lustre-discuss] wiki.lustre.org - input on community content

[Christopher J. Morrone]

The sidebar is just a list of links to pages in the wiki.  Anyone that 
wants to have a high level topic page should just go ahead and make the 
relevant wiki page, much like how Scott created the 
http://wiki.lustre.org/Monitoring page.

If you make a page that is a general enough starting point to have a 
link from the sidebar, just let me know and I can add that for you.

Chris

On 04/28/2015 02:00 PM, Justin Miller wrote:
> I’d like to request a Testing section where I can migrate some of the
> wiki.old.lustre.org content to and begin updating it.
>
> - Justin
>
> On 4/28/15, 3:50 PM, "Christopher J. Morrone" <morrone2 at llnl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Sure, no problem!  I just added a Monitoring section to the sidebar for
>> you.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On 04/28/2015 01:25 PM, Scott Nolin wrote:
>>> Thank you for clarifying the OpenSFS vs lustre.org thing Chris, this
>>> makes sense to me.
>>>
>>> That makes it even easier. So my suggestions now mostly boil down to
>>> getting links to category information in the sidebar. I'm guessing that
>>> can either be done manually by a site admin or with a mediawiki
>>> extension of some kind.
>>>
>>> Thanks again,
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> On 4/28/2015 3:11 PM, Christopher J. Morrone wrote:
>>>> On 04/28/2015 11:58 AM, Scott Nolin wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> With the new lustre.org and wiki.lustre.org site there is an
>>>>> opportunity
>>>>> to make this a more useful tool for community involvement with Lustre.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are my ideas for how to arrange the new site. I know Chris
>>>>> Morrone
>>>>> and OpenSFS members are interested in what the community can do with
>>>>> this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please weigh in with your ideas too.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Top Level / Menu Bar links should lead to all the content. This
>>>>> requires some site-level editoral work to make it sensible.
>>>>
>>>> Absolutely.
>>>>
>>>>> 2) Make a section for OpenSFS type links - I'm thinking the kind of
>>>>> stuff that is already there, such as 'Development' 'Projects" and so
>>>>> on
>>>>> - probably news and announcements too.
>>>>
>>>> Granted, OpenSFS plays a large part in planning and funding Lustre
>>>> releases and development work, but those wiki pages are explicitly
>>>> meant
>>>> to be Lustre-centric rather than OpenSFS-centric.
>>>>
>>>>> 3) Make another section for community content. This should be also in
>>>>> the menu bar.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think that we want to do that.  Our stance should be that the
>>>> entire wiki is community content.  We don't want to split the
>>>> wiki.lustre.org into community and non-community sections.  For things
>>>> that are genuinely OpenSFS specific, they will remain on OpenSFS's
>>>> wiki.
>>>>    I believe that EOFS will do the same.
>>>>
>>>> For instance, it is my intent that
>>>> http://wiki.opensfs.org/Lustre_Working_Group remain on the OpenSFS
>>>> wiki.
>>>>    The OpenSFS contracts will be tracked on OpenSFS's wiki.  But much of
>>>> the output of our LWG work and contracts will result in generally
>>>> applicable Lustre documentation that we will feed to the lustre.org
>>>> wiki.
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> lustre-discuss mailing list
>>>> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>>>> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lustre-discuss mailing list
>>> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>>> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lustre-discuss mailing list
>> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>