[lustre-discuss] lustre client server interoperability

[Patrick Farrell]

No - 2.5 is the last public stable client release from Intel.

On 8/11/15, 2:22 PM, "Kurt Strosahl" <strosahl at jlab.org> wrote:

>So is there a stable client for centos 7 that is backwards compatible
>with 2.5.3?
>
>w/r,
>Kurt
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Patrick Farrell" <paf at cray.com>
>To: "Kurt Strosahl" <strosahl at jlab.org>, lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 4:24:15 PM
>Subject: RE: lustre client server interoperability
>
>Kurt,
>
>Yes.  It's worth noting that 2.7 is probably marginally less reliable
>than 2.5, since it has had no updates/fixes since it was released.
>________________________________________
>From: lustre-discuss [lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org] on behalf
>of Kurt Strosahl [strosahl at jlab.org]
>Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 2:25 PM
>To: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>Subject: [lustre-discuss] lustre client server interoperability
>
>Hello,
>
>   Is the 2.7 lustre client compatible with lustre 2.5.3 servers?  I'm
>running a 2.5.3 system lustre system, but have been asked by a few people
>about upgrading some of our clients to CentOS 7 (which appears to need a
>2.7 or greater client).
>
>w/r,
>Kurt J. Strosahl
>System Administrator
>Scientific Computing Group, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
>_______________________________________________
>lustre-discuss mailing list
>lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org