[lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.7.0 stable enough?
Drokin, Oleg
oleg.drokin at intel.com
Wed May 27 23:09:46 PDT 2015
Hello!
Um, have you tried to disable selinux yet?
Bye,
Oleg
On May 27, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> trying to set up my test Lustre testbed, however, I didn't get very far.
>
> mkfs.lustre --fsname=Lustre1 --mgs --mdt --index=0 /dev/sda4
>
> mount /dev/sda4 /mnt/lustre-mgs -t lustre
>
> and mount hangs.
>
> INFO: task mount.lustre:12281 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> Not tainted 2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.x86_64 #1
> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> mount.lustre D 0000000000000000 0 12281 12280 0x00000080
> ffff88186b937c70 0000000000000082 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> 00000000ffffffea ffff88186b937c78 0000005eeb2941f8 ffff88186b937c48
> 0000000000000286 000000010001a232 ffff8818576d1068 ffff88186b937fd8
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8152cf45>] rwsem_down_failed_common+0x95/0x1d0
> [<ffffffff8152d0d6>] rwsem_down_read_failed+0x26/0x30
> [<ffffffff81298e34>] call_rwsem_down_read_failed+0x14/0x30
> [<ffffffff8152c5d4>] ? down_read+0x24/0x30
> [<ffffffffa072c94c>] ldiskfs_quota_off+0x1bc/0x1f0 [ldiskfs]
> [<ffffffff812395ba>] ? selinux_sb_copy_data+0x14a/0x1e0
> [<ffffffff81190b96>] deactivate_locked_super+0x46/0x90
> [<ffffffff81190ced>] vfs_kern_mount+0x10d/0x1b0
> [<ffffffff81190e02>] do_kern_mount+0x52/0x130
> [<ffffffff811b29cb>] do_mount+0x2fb/0x930
> [<ffffffff811b3090>] sys_mount+0x90/0xe0
> [<ffffffff8100b072>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
>
> Am I doing something terribly wrong?
>
> --
> Lukáš Hejtmánek
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list