[lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.8.0 released

[Jones, Peter A]

Bob

Can you check whether the build at
https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/lustre-reviews/38084/ works as expected?

Peter

On 3/28/16, 8:12 PM, "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin at intel.com> wrote:

>We are definitely not planning to replace the existing RPMs to avoid any
>confusion.
>
>We are debating other ways of relieving the situation without waiting for
>2.9 and we'll update the list once the fix is really ready.
>Right now it has not even landed to master as you can see.
>
>On Mar 28, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Bob Ball wrote:
>
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Are you going to replace the 2.8 rpm sets in your repos, or just leave
>>them that way until 2.9?  Yeah, that is a provocative question.  It just
>>seems to me that it is such a fundamental thing, that a new rpm set
>>should be created for distribution.
>> 
>> bob
>> 
>> On 3/28/2016 4:20 PM, Glossman, Bob wrote:
>>> Bob,
>>> This is a known issue.  A fix is already in flight, see LU-7887
>>>https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-7887.
>>> 
>>> In the short term this can be worked around by building your own from
>>>source.
>>> It is strictly an issue of our build framework.
>>> Doesn¹t impact on manual builds at all.
>>> 
>>> Bob Glossman
>>> HPDD Software Engineer
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 3/28/16, 1:11 PM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Bob Ball"
>>><lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of ball at umich.edu>
>>>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Has anyone else noticed that the lnetctl command is missing from this
>>>> rpm set?  I mean, an entire chapter of the manual dedicated to this
>>>> command, and it is not present?
>>>> 
>>>> Will this be fixed?
>>>> 
>>>> bob
>>>> 
>>>> On 3/16/2016 6:13 PM, Jones, Peter A wrote:
>>>>> We are pleased to announce that the Lustre 2.8.0 Release has been
>>>>>declared GA and is available for
>>>>><https://downloads.hpdd.intel.com/public/lustre/latest-feature-release
>>>>>/> 
>>>>>download<https://downloads.hpdd.intel.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.8.0/>
>>>>> <https://downloads.hpdd.intel.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.8.0/> . You
>>>>>can also grab the source from
>>>>><http://git.whamcloud.com/fs/lustre-release.git/commit/ea79df5af4d9b03
>>>>>4e39caa396cefc2a075e572ba>
>>>>>git<http://git.whamcloud.com/fs/lustre-release.git/commit/ea79df5af4d9
>>>>>b034e39caa396cefc2a075e572ba>
>>>>> 
>>>>> This major release includes new features:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Distributed Namespace (DNE) Asynchronous Commit of cross-MDT updates
>>>>>for improved performance. Remote rename and remote hard link
>>>>>functionality. This completes the work funded by OpenSFS to allow the
>>>>>usage of multiple metadata servers
>>>>>(LU-3534<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3534>)
>>>>> 
>>>>> LFSCK Phase 4 Performance and efficiency improvements to the online
>>>>>filesystem consistency checker. This completes this OpenSFS-funded
>>>>>work  (LU-6361<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6361>)
>>>>> Red Hat 7.x Server Support  This release offers support for both
>>>>>servers and clients with RHEL 7.2
>>>>>(LU-5022<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5022>)
>>>>> 
>>>>> SE Linux support for Lustre client  Added the capability to enforce
>>>>>SE Linux security policies for Lustre clients. This work was
>>>>>contributed by Atos.
>>>>>(LU-5560<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5560>)
>>>>> Multiple Metadata RPCs  Support of multiple metadata modifications
>>>>>per client (in last_rcvd file) to improve the multi-threaded metadata
>>>>>performance of a single client. This work was contributed by Atos.
>>>>>(LU-5319<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5319>)
>>>>> Fuller details can be found in the 2.8 wiki
>>>>>page<http://wiki.lustre.org/Release_2.8.0> (including the change
>>>>>log<http://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_2.8.0_Changelog> and test
>>>>>mat<http://wiki.lustre.org/Release_2.8.0#Test_Matrix>rix<http://wiki.l
>>>>>ustre.org/Release_2.8.0#Test_Matrix>)
>>>>> The following are known issues in the Lustre 2.8 Release:
>>>>> 
>>>>> LU-7404<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-7404> ­ Running with
>>>>>ZFS 0.6.5 and newer versions can result in client evictions while
>>>>>under load conditions. This is due to an upstream ZFS
>>>>>issue<https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/4210>
>>>>> LU-7836<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-7836> ­ Performing
>>>>>failover with multiple MDTs per MDS can result in excessive memory
>>>>>consumption . It is recommended to deploy with a single MDT per MDS
>>>>>until a fix is in place for this issue
>>>>> Work is in progress for these issues.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please log any issues found in the issue tracking
>>>>>system<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/>
>>>>> We would like to thank OpenSFS<http://www.opensfs.org/>, for their
>>>>>contributions towards the cost of the release and also to all Lustre
>>>>>community members who have contributed to the release with code,
>>>>>reviews or testing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> lustre-discuss mailing list
>>>>> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>>>>> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> lustre-discuss mailing list
>>>> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>>>> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lustre-discuss mailing list
>> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>