[lustre-discuss] poor performance on reading small files
Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr)
rmohr at utk.edu
Wed Aug 3 12:24:07 PDT 2016
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Ben Evans <bevans at cray.com> wrote:
>
> I thought read caching was disabled by default, as the kernel's default
> handling of pages was better.
You might be right. It has been a while since I have set up a Lustre file system from scratch, and I haven’t done so for newer versions of Lustre. So it’s possible I am mistaken about the defaults.
--
Rick Mohr
Senior HPC System Administrator
National Institute for Computational Sciences
http://www.nics.tennessee.edu
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list