[lustre-discuss] more on lustre striping
Ashley Pittman
ashley at pittman.co.uk
Fri Jun 10 05:29:02 PDT 2016
On 22/05/16 02:56, John Bauer wrote:
>
> Oleg
>
> I can intercept the fopen(), but that does me no good as I can't set
> the O_LOV_DELAY_CREATE bit. What I can not intercept is the open()
> downstream of fopen(). If one examines the symbols in libc you will
> see there are no unsatisfied externals relating to open, which means
> there is nothing for the runtime linker to find concerning open's. I
> will have a look at the Lustre 1.8 source, but I seriously doubt that
> the open beneath fopen() was intercepted with LD_PRELOAD. I would
> love to find a way to do that. I could throw away a lot of code.
> Thanks, John
>
Could you not intercept fopen() and implement it with calls to open()
and fdopen() yourself which would give you full control over what you're
looking for here?
Ashley.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20160610/ac16a068/attachment.htm>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list