[lustre-discuss] Questions about migrate OSTs from ldiskfs to zfs

[Drokin, Oleg]

On Mar 1, 2016, at 4:14 PM, Christopher J. Morrone wrote:

> On 03/01/2016 09:18 AM, Alexander I Kulyavtsev wrote:
> 
>> is tag 2.5.3.90 considered stable?
> 
> No.  Generally speaking you do not want to use anything with number 50
> or greater for the fourth number unless you are helping out with testing
> during the development process.

I think you are mixing up things and it is the 3rd number at 50 or above
that is the development code.


> 2.5.3 was the last official release on branch b2_5 before it was
> discontinued.


In this case 2.5.3.90 is "almost" 2.5.4 but not quite.
We wanted to have a tag in b2_5 before commits there ceased so that we can refer
to it by a version number vs the "tip of b2_5".
It contains various fixes on top of 2.5.3, but as far as I know, it did not
undergo the actual release testing that the point release would normally undergo.

Since the b2_5 at the time was a maintenance branch, we mostly tried to place
important fixes there that should not have broken anything.
But due to lack of proper release testing this could not be guaranteed by us,
so using it is still a bit of a leap of faith, but not quite as much as say
2.5.51.0 or 2.6.55.0 or the like.

Bye,
    Oleg