[lustre-discuss] Error Lustre/multipath/storage

Angelo acrribeiro at gmail.com
Tue Mar 29 06:18:51 PDT 2016


Sorry for my mistake, Andreas.

I'm using RAID-1 for the MDT.

Regards,
Angelo

2016-03-28 19:51 GMT-03:00 Dilger, Andreas <andreas.dilger at intel.com>:

> On 2016/03/28, 08:01, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Angelo Cavalcanti" <
> lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of acrribeiro at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> We're having trouble with a lustre 2.5.3 implementation. This is our setup:
>
>
>    -
>
>    One server for MGS/MDS/MDT. MDT is served from a raid-6 backed
>    partition of 2TB (que tipo de hd?)
>
>
> Note that using RAID-6 for the MDT storage will significantly hurt your
> metadata
> performance, since this will incur a lot of read-modify-write overhead
> when doing
> 4KB metadata block updates.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
> --
> Andreas Dilger
> Lustre Principal Architect
> Intel High Performance Data Division
>
>
>    -
>
>    Two OSS/OST in a active/active HA with pacemaker. Both are connected
>    to a storage via SAS.
>
>
>
>    - One SGI Infinite Storage IS5600 with two raid-6 backed volume
>    groups. Each group has two volumes, each volume has 15TB capacity.
>
>
> Volumes are recognized by OSSs as multipath devices, each voulme has 4
> paths. Volumes were created with a GPT partition table and a single
> partition.
>
> Volume partitions were then formatted as OSTs with the following command:
>
> # mkfs.lustre --replace --reformat --ost --mkfsoptions=" -E
> stride=128,stripe_width=1024"
> --mountfsoptions="errors=remount-ro,extents,mballoc" --fsname=lustre1
> --mgsnode=10.149.0.153 at o2ib1 --index=0 --servicenode=10.149.0.151 at o2ib1
> --servicenode=10.149.0.152 at o2ib1
> /dev/mapper/360080e500029eaec0000012656951fcap1
>
>
> Testing with bonnie++ in a client with the below command:
>
> $ ./bonnie++-1.03e/bonnie++ -m lustre1 -d /mnt/lustre -s 128G:1024k -n 0
> -f -b -u vhpc
>
>
> No problem creating files inside the lustre mount point, but *rewriting*
> the same files results in the errors below:
>
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 multipathd: 8:128: mark as failed
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 multipathd: 360080e500029eaec0000012656951fca:
> remaining active paths: 3
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sdi] Unhandled error code
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sdi] Result:
> hostbyte=DID_SOFT_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sdi] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 06
> d8 22 00 20 00 00
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: __ratelimit: 109 callbacks suppressed
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: device-mapper: multipath: Failing path 8:128.
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 1:0:1:0: [sdm] Unhandled error code
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 1:0:1:0: [sdm] Result:
> hostbyte=DID_SOFT_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 1:0:1:0: [sdm] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 07
> 18 22 00 18 00 00
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: device-mapper: multipath: Failing path 8:192.
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 1:0:1:0: [sdm] Unhandled error code
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 1:0:1:0: [sdm] Result:
> hostbyte=DID_SOFT_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 1:0:1:0: [sdm] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 06
> d8 22 00 20 00 00
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 0:0:1:0: [sde] Unhandled error code
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 0:0:1:0: [sde] Result:
> hostbyte=DID_SOFT_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 0:0:1:0: [sde] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 07
> 18 22 00 18 00 00
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: device-mapper: multipath: Failing path 8:64.
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Unhandled error code
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Result:
> hostbyte=DID_SOFT_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 07
> 18 22 00 18 00 00
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: device-mapper: multipath: Failing path 8:0.
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Unhandled error code
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Result:
> hostbyte=DID_SOFT_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
>
> Mar 18 17:46:13 oss01 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 06
> d8 22 00 20 00 00
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 multipathd: 360080e500029eaec0000012656951fca: sdi -
> rdac checker reports path is up
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 multipathd: 8:128: reinstated
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 multipathd: 360080e500029eaec0000012656951fca:
> remaining active paths: 4
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sdi] Unhandled error code
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sdi] Result:
> hostbyte=DID_SOFT_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sdi] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 07
> 18 22 00 18 00 00
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 kernel: device-mapper: multipath: Failing path 8:128.
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sdi] Unhandled error code
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sdi] Result:
> hostbyte=DID_SOFT_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sdi] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 06
> d8 22 00 20 00 00
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 multipathd: 8:128: mark as failed
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 multipathd: 360080e500029eaec0000012656951fca:
> remaining active paths: 3
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 multipathd: 8:192: mark as failed
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 multipathd: 360080e500029eaec0000012656951fca:
> remaining active paths: 2
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 multipathd: 8:0: mark as failed
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 multipathd: 360080e500029eaec0000012656951fca:
> remaining active paths: 1
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 multipathd: 8:64: mark as failed
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 multipathd: 360080e500029eaec0000012656951fca:
> Entering recovery mode: max_retries=30
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 multipathd: 360080e500029eaec0000012656951fca:
> remaining active paths: 0
>
> Mar 18 17:46:14 oss01 multipathd: 360080e500029eaec0000012656951fca:
> Entering recovery mode: max_retries=30
>
> Mar 18 17:46:19 oss01 multipathd: 360080e500029eaec0000012656951fca: sdi -
> rdac checker reports path is up
>
>
> Multipath configuration ( /etc/multipath.conf ) is below, and is correct
> according to the vendor (SGI).
>
>
> defaults {
>
>        user_friendly_names no
>
> }
>
>
> blacklist {
>
>        wwid "*"
>
> }
>
>
> blacklist_exceptions {
>
>        wwid "360080e500029eaec0000012656951fca"
>
>        wwid "360080e500029eaec0000012956951fcb"
>
>        wwid "360080e500029eaec0000012c56951fcb"
>
>        wwid "360080e500029eaec0000012f56951fcb"
>
> }
>
>
> devices {
>
>       device {
>
>         vendor                       "SGI"
>
>         product                      "IS.*"
>
>         product_blacklist            "Universal Xport"
>
>         getuid_callout               "/lib/udev/scsi_id --whitelisted
> --device=/dev/%n"
>
>         prio                         "rdac"
>
>         features                     "2 pg_init_retries 50"
>
>         hardware_handler             "1 rdac"
>
>         path_grouping_policy         "group_by_prio"
>
>         failback                     "immediate"
>
>         rr_weight                    "uniform"
>
>         no_path_retry                30
>
>         retain_attached_hw_handler   "yes"
>
>         detect_prio                  "yes"
>
>         #rr_min_io                   1000
>
>         path_checker                 "rdac"
>
>         #selector                    "round-robin 0"
>
>         #polling_interval            10
>
>       }
>
> }
>
>
>
> multipaths {
>
>        multipath {
>
>                wwid "360080e500029eaec0000012656951fca"
>
>        }
>
>        multipath {
>
>                wwid "360080e500029eaec0000012956951fcb"
>
>        }
>
>        multipath {
>
>                wwid "360080e500029eaec0000012c56951fcb"
>
>        }
>
>        multipath {
>
>                wwid "360080e500029eaec0000012f56951fcb"
>
>        }
>
> }
>
>
> Many many combinations of OST formating options were tried, internal and
> external journaling … But the same errors persist.
>
>
> The same bonnie++ tests were repeated on all volumes of the storage using
> only ext4, all successful.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Angelo
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20160329/1228b75c/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list