[lustre-discuss] Best way to run serverside 2.8 w. MOFED 4.1 on Centos 7.2

Jeff Johnson jeff.johnson at aeoncomputing.com
Fri Aug 18 10:08:46 PDT 2017


John,

You can rebuild 2.8 against MOFED. 1) Install MOFED version of choice. 2)
Pull down the 2.8 Lustre source and configure with
'--with-o2ib=/usr/src/ofa_kernel/default'. 3) `make rpms` 4) Install. 5)
Profit.

--Jeff

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 9:41 AM, john casu <john at chiraldynamics.com> wrote:

> I have an existing 2.8 install that broke when we added MOFED into the mix.
>
> Nothing I do wrt installing 2.8 rpms works to fix this, and I get a couple
> of missing symbole, when I install lustre-modules:
> depmod: WARNING: /lib/modules/3.10.0-327.3.1.el
> 7_lustre.x86_64/extra/kernel/net/lustre/ko2iblnd.ko needs unknown symbol
> ib_query_device
> depmod: WARNING: /lib/modules/3.10.0-327.3.1.el
> 7_lustre.x86_64/extra/kernel/net/lustre/ko2iblnd.ko needs unknown symbol
> ib_alloc_pd
>
> I'm assuming the issue is that lustre 2.8 is built using the standard
> Centos 7.2 infiniband drivers.
>
> I can't move to Centos 7.3, at this time.  Is there any way to get 2.8 up
> & running w. mofed without rebuilding lustre rpms?
>
> If I have to rebuild, it'd probably be easier to go to 2.10 (and zfs
> 0.7.1). Is that a correct assumption?
> Or will the 2.10 rpms work on Centps 7.2?
>
> thanks,
> -john c
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>



-- 
------------------------------
Jeff Johnson
Co-Founder
Aeon Computing

jeff.johnson at aeoncomputing.com
www.aeoncomputing.com
t: 858-412-3810 x1001   f: 858-412-3845
m: 619-204-9061

4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117

High-Performance Computing / Lustre Filesystems / Scale-out Storage
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20170818/5d7ae8fa/attachment.htm>


More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list