[lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

Jones, Peter A peter.a.jones at intel.com
Mon Jul 17 10:28:29 PDT 2017


I suggest opening a JIRA ticket and someone can look into this




On 7/17/17, 9:42 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Götz Waschk" <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of goetz.waschk at gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi Peter,
>
>I wasn't able to install the official binary build of
>kmod-lustre-osd-zfs, even with kmod-zfs-0.6.5.9-1.el7_3.centos from
>from zfsonlinux.org, the ksym deps do not match. For me, it is always
>rebuilding the lustre source rpm against the zfs kmod packages.
>
>Regards, Götz Waschk
>
>On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Jones, Peter A <peter.a.jones at intel.com> wrote:
>> 0.6.5.9 according to lustre/Changelog. We have tested with pre-release versions of 0.7 during the release cycle too if that’s what you’re wondering.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/17/17, 1:55 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Götz Waschk" <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of goetz.waschk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi everyone,
>>>
>>>which version of kmod-zfs was the official Lustre 2.10.0 binary
>>>release for CentOS 7.3 built against?
>>>
>>>Regards, Götz Waschk
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>lustre-discuss mailing list
>>>lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>>>http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>_______________________________________________
>lustre-discuss mailing list
>lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list