[lustre-discuss] IOR input for pathologic file system abuse
Ben Evans
bevans at cray.com
Tue Jun 13 07:41:22 PDT 2017
Not with dd or IOR, but one of the worst I've seen has been using named
pipes for inter-process communication. That and doing 4 and 8 byte I/O's
using O_DIRECT.
-Ben
On 6/12/17, 5:50 PM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Cory Spitz"
<lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of spitzcor at cray.com>
wrote:
>Michael,
>
>The worst case would probably involve reading/writing the same file
>extents across multiple nodes. You could probably whip up a script using
>/bin/dd for such a thing. Or is that too evil for you?
>
>-Cory
>
>--
>
>
>On 6/2/17, 2:32 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Michael Kluge"
><lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of
>michael.kluge at tu-dresden.de> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking for IOR scripts that represent pathological use cases
>for file systems. Something like shared file access with a small,
>unaligned block size or random I/O to a shared file. Does anyone has some
>input for me there that he/she is willing to share?
>
>
> Regards, Michael
>
> --
> Dr.-Ing. Michael Kluge
>
> Technische Universität Dresden
> Center for Information Services and
> High Performance Computing (ZIH)
> D-01062 Dresden
> Germany
>
> Contact:
> Falkenbrunnen, Room 240
> Phone: (+49) 351 463-34217
> Fax: (+49) 351 463-37773
> e-mail: michael.kluge at tu-dresden.de
> WWW: http://www.tu-dresden.de/zih
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>lustre-discuss mailing list
>lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list