[lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.8.0 - MDT/MGT failing to mount
colin.faber at seagate.com
Thu May 4 09:02:26 PDT 2017
Ah yes, sorry I should have been more clear.
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Patrick Farrell <paf at cray.com> wrote:
> Hm, I'm not sure everyone here is talking about the same ordering...
> As I understand it:
> The writeconf process is to unmount everything, then writeconf all your
> targets (order doesn't matter, pretty sure - Someone will correct me if
> not...), then mount in the order Colin gave - MGS/MDT, then OSTs, then
> - Patrick
> *From:* lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> on
> behalf of Colin Faber <colin.faber at seagate.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 4, 2017 10:51:06 AM
> *To:* Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr)
> *Cc:* lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> *Subject:* Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.8.0 - MDT/MGT failing to mount
> Yes MGS/MDT as well as OSTs, Remount MGS/MDT, then OSTs, then clients.
> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr) <
> rmohr at utk.edu> wrote:
>> > On May 4, 2017, at 11:03 AM, Steve Barnet <barnet at icecube.wisc.edu>
>> > On 5/4/17 10:01 AM, Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr) wrote:
>> >> Did you try doing a writeconf to regenerate the config logs for the
>> file system?
>> > Not yet, but quick enough to try. Do this for the MDT/MGT first,
>> > then the OSTs?
>> I believe that is correct, but you should check the Lustre manual to be
>> certain of the procedure.
>> Rick Mohr
>> Senior HPC System Administrator
>> National Institute for Computational Sciences
>> lustre-discuss mailing list
>> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the lustre-discuss