[lustre-discuss] 1 MDS and 1 OSS

[E.S. Rosenberg]

Maybe someone can answer this in the context of this question, is there any
performance gain over classic filers when you are using only a single OSS?

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ravi Konila <ravibhatk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Majid
>
> It is better to go for HA for both OSS and MDS. You would need 2 nos of
> MDS and 2 nos of OSS (identical configuration).
> Also use latest Lustre 2.10.1 release.
>
> Regards
> *Ravi Konila*
>
>
> *From:* Amjad Syed
> *Sent:* Monday, October 30, 2017 1:17 PM
> *To:* lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> *Subject:* [lustre-discuss] 1 MDS and 1 OSS
>
> Hello
> We are in process in procuring one small Lustre filesystem giving us 120
> TB  of storage using Lustre 2.X.
> The vendor has proposed only 1 MDS and 1 OSS as a solution.
> The query we have is that is this configuration enough , or we need more
> OSS?
> The MDS and OSS server are identical  with regards to RAM (64 GB) and  HDD
> (300GB)
>
> Thanks
> Majid
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20171030/1821571e/attachment.html>