[lustre-discuss] latest kernel version supported by Lustre ?

[Riccardo Veraldi]

thank you.
Yes I could build lustre 2.10.3 on Kernel 4.4 without any trouble.


On 4/9/18 6:52 AM, Jones, Peter A wrote:
> Ah sorry about that– I was reading Andreas’s response rather than
> Riccardo’s original request. Thanks for pointing out my error Patrick.
> In that case we are tracking this less closely and the latest that I
> am aware of is Ubuntu 16 with a 4.4 kernel should work for 2.11. This
> was not an officially supported option but I know that some people
> have used this.
>
> On 2018-04-09, 6:11 AM, "Patrick Farrell" <paf at cray.com
> <mailto:paf at cray.com>> wrote:
>
>     Peter,
>
>     Unfortunately, Riccardo was asking about server support.
>
>     - Patrick
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org
>     <mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org>> on behalf of
>     Jones, Peter A <peter.a.jones at intel.com
>     <mailto:peter.a.jones at intel.com>>
>     *Sent:* Monday, April 9, 2018 7:24:52 AM
>     *To:* Dilger, Andreas; Riccardo Veraldi
>     *Cc:* lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>     <mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
>     *Subject:* Re: [lustre-discuss] latest kernel version supported by
>     Lustre ?
>      
>     We’re more up to date than that - we have 4.12 client support in
>     2.10.3 and 2.11 (see LU-9558). We’re tracking 4.14 client support
>     under LU-10560 and the last couple of patches just missed out on
>     2.11 but should land to master in the coming days. Work to track
>     4.15 is underway under LU-10805. James Simmons may well elaborate.
>
>
>
>
>     On 2018-04-08, 12:17 PM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Dilger,
>     Andreas" <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org
>     <mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> on behalf of
>     andreas.dilger at intel.com <mailto:andreas.dilger at intel.com>> wrote:
>
>     >What version of Lustre?  I think 2.11 clients work with something
>     like 4.8? kernels, while 2.10 works with 4.4?  Sorry, I can't
>     check the specifics right now.
>     >
>     >If you need a specific kernel, the best thing to do is try the
>     configure/build step for Lustre with that kernel, and then check
>     Jira/Gerrit for tickets for each build failure you hit.
>     >
>     >It may be that there are some unlanded patches that can get you a
>     running client.
>     >
>     >Cheers, Andreas
>     >
>     >> On Apr 7, 2018, at 09:48, Riccardo Veraldi
>     <Riccardo.Veraldi at cnaf.infn.it
>     <mailto:Riccardo.Veraldi at cnaf.infn.it>> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> Hello,
>     >>
>     >> if I would like to use kernel 4.* from elrepo on RHEL74 for the
>     lustre
>     >> OSSes what is the latest supported kernel 4 version  by Lustre ?
>     >>
>     >> thank you
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Rick
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> lustre-discuss mailing list
>     >> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>     <mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
>     >> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>     >_______________________________________________
>     >lustre-discuss mailing list
>     >lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>     <mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
>     >http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>     _______________________________________________
>     lustre-discuss mailing list
>     lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>     <mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
>     http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20180409/2ba91332/attachment.html>