[lustre-discuss] Upgrade to 2.11: unrecognized mount option

[Jones, Peter A]

It was sent to lustre-discuss (among others). Maybe I’ve fallen foul of Eli’s spam filter :-)

On 2018-04-11, 9:04 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Patrick Farrell" <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> on behalf of paf at cray.com<mailto:paf at cray.com>> wrote:

I think you missed it – It came out a few days ago, and Peter Jones announced it in what I assume was the usual manner.  Maybe there’s a “which lists were sent to” issue?


  *   Patrick

From: lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org>> on behalf of "E.S. Rosenberg" <esr+lustre at mail.hebrew.edu<mailto:esr+lustre at mail.hebrew.edu>>
Date: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 10:58 AM
To: "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger at intel.com<mailto:andreas.dilger at intel.com>>
Cc: "lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>" <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>>
Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Upgrade to 2.11: unrecognized mount option

OT: Did I miss the mail announcing Lustre 2.11 or all the recent 2.11 mails early adapters?
Thanks,
Eli

On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 2:58 AM, Dilger, Andreas <andreas.dilger at intel.com<mailto:andreas.dilger at intel.com>> wrote:
On Apr 6, 2018, at 06:27, Thomas Roth <t.roth at gsi.de<mailto:t.roth at gsi.de>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> (don't know if it isn't a bit early to complain yet, but)
> I have upgraded an OSS and MDS von 2.10.2 to 2.11.0, just installing the downloaded rpms - no issues here, except when mounting the MDS:
>
> > LDISKFS-fs (drbd0): Unrecognized mount option "context="unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0"" or missing value
>
> This mount option is visible also by 'tunefs.lustre --dryrun', so I followed a tip on this list from last May and did
>
> > tunefs.lustre --mountfsoptions="user_xattr,errors=remount-ro" /dev/drbd0
>
> = keeping the rest of the mount options. Afterwards the mount worked.
>
>
> I checked, I formatted this MDS with
>
> > mkfs.lustre --reformat --mgs --mdt --fsname=hebetest --index=0
> --servicenode=10.20.1.198 at o2ib5 --servicenode=10.20.1.199 at o2ib5
> --mgsnode=10.20.1.198 at o2ib5 --mgsnode=10.20.1.199 at o2ib5
> --mkfsoptions="-E stride=4,stripe-width=20 -O flex_bg,mmp,uninit_bg" /dev/drbd0
>
>
> Just the defaults here?
> Where did the unknown mount option come from, and what does it mean anyway?

I suspect it's automatically added by SELinux, but I couldn't tell you
where or why.  Hopefully one of the people more familiar with SELinux
can answer, and it can be handled properly in the future.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation







_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20180411/725116e3/attachment.html>