[lustre-discuss] Upgrade to 2.11: unrecognized mount option

[E.S. Rosenberg]

Actually that linked article is dated today, so I guess the official mail
announcement was still to come!

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:06 PM, E.S. Rosenberg <esr+lustre at mail.hebrew.edu>
wrote:

> I'm on lustre-discuss and HPDD-discuss and didn't get it on either.
> Thanks anyhow!
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Patrick Farrell <paf at cray.com> wrote:
>
>> I think you missed it – It came out a few days ago, and Peter Jones
>> announced it in what I assume was the usual manner.  Maybe there’s a “which
>> lists were sent to” issue?
>>
>>
>>
>>    - Patrick
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> on
>> behalf of "E.S. Rosenberg" <esr+lustre at mail.hebrew.edu>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 10:58 AM
>> *To: *"Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger at intel.com>
>> *Cc: *"lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org" <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [lustre-discuss] Upgrade to 2.11: unrecognized mount
>> option
>>
>>
>>
>> OT: Did I miss the mail announcing Lustre 2.11 or all the recent 2.11
>> mails early adapters?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Eli
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 2:58 AM, Dilger, Andreas <andreas.dilger at intel.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 6, 2018, at 06:27, Thomas Roth <t.roth at gsi.de> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > (don't know if it isn't a bit early to complain yet, but)
>> > I have upgraded an OSS and MDS von 2.10.2 to 2.11.0, just installing
>> the downloaded rpms - no issues here, except when mounting the MDS:
>> >
>> > > LDISKFS-fs (drbd0): Unrecognized mount option
>> "context="unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0"" or missing value
>> >
>> > This mount option is visible also by 'tunefs.lustre --dryrun', so I
>> followed a tip on this list from last May and did
>> >
>> > > tunefs.lustre --mountfsoptions="user_xattr,errors=remount-ro"
>> /dev/drbd0
>> >
>> > = keeping the rest of the mount options. Afterwards the mount worked.
>> >
>> >
>> > I checked, I formatted this MDS with
>> >
>> > > mkfs.lustre --reformat --mgs --mdt --fsname=hebetest --index=0
>> > --servicenode=10.20.1.198 at o2ib5 --servicenode=10.20.1.199 at o2ib5
>> > --mgsnode=10.20.1.198 at o2ib5 --mgsnode=10.20.1.199 at o2ib5
>> > --mkfsoptions="-E stride=4,stripe-width=20 -O flex_bg,mmp,uninit_bg"
>> /dev/drbd0
>> >
>> >
>> > Just the defaults here?
>> > Where did the unknown mount option come from, and what does it mean
>> anyway?
>>
>> I suspect it's automatically added by SELinux, but I couldn't tell you
>> where or why.  Hopefully one of the people more familiar with SELinux
>> can answer, and it can be handled properly in the future.
>>
>> Cheers, Andreas
>> --
>> Andreas Dilger
>> Lustre Principal Architect
>> Intel Corporation
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lustre-discuss mailing list
>> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20180411/adc0313e/attachment.html>