[lustre-discuss] 2.10.4 git source link is dead
pjones at whamcloud.com
Sun Aug 26 08:15:14 PDT 2018
I would certainly hope that it will be out in that timeframe. We are an advanced stage of testing RC2 ATM but, of course, until all testing is complete there is still a risk that we find something that requires investigation and means the dates will drift out. The code is at https://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/b2_10
From: "E.S. Rosenberg" <esr+lustre at mail.hebrew.edu>
Date: Sunday, August 26, 2018 at 8:01 AM
To: Peter Jones <pjones at whamcloud.com>
Cc: Lustre discussion <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] 2.10.4 git source link is dead
How short is shortly? I'm about to compile 2.10.4 but if it's here within 1-2 weeks then 2.10.5 should be what I use....
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Peter Jones <pjones at whamcloud.com<mailto:pjones at whamcloud.com>> wrote:
Yes, the link was correct at the time it was published, but it (and every similar link from past releases) is now obsolete since the Lustre development infrastructure was moved a couple of months ago. Anyone with an account can make corrections to the wiki but the website itself has only a couple of people with permissions so it really would depend on their inclination to make retroactive corrections like this. However, the good news is that 2.10.5 should be out shortly at that will have links that reflect the current reality.
From: lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org>> on behalf of "E.S. Rosenberg" <esr+lustre at mail.hebrew.edu<mailto:esr%2Blustre at mail.hebrew.edu>>
Date: Sunday, August 26, 2018 at 7:47 AM
To: Lustre discussion <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>>
Subject: [lustre-discuss] 2.10.4 git source link is dead
The link to the 2.10.4 source on http://lustre.org/lustre-2-10-4-released/
returns 404 - no such project.
After some digging it seems the link should be:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the lustre-discuss