[lustre-discuss] lustre-discuss Digest, Vol 150, Issue 14

Tue Sep 11 05:10:44 PDT 2018

I will attempt to create an LU with our specific information. I’ve not done that before, I believe I’ll need an account somewhere??

> On Sep 11, 2018, at 7:02 AM, "lustre-discuss-request at lists.lustre.org" <lustre-discuss-request at lists.lustre.org> wrote:
> 
> Send lustre-discuss mailing list submissions to
>    lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    lustre-discuss-request at lists.lustre.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    lustre-discuss-owner at lists.lustre.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of lustre-discuss digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: Lustre/ZFS snapshots mount error (Yong, Fan)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:00:00 +0000
> From: "Yong, Fan" <fan.yong at intel.com>
> To: Robert Redl <robert.redl at lmu.de>,
>    "lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org" <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
> Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre/ZFS snapshots mount error
> Message-ID:
>    <7FB055E0B36B6F4EB93E637E0640A56FCC040F04 at FMSMSX125.amr.corp.intel.com>
>    
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Changelog is just one of the users for llog. There are many other users for llog. Means that even if without changelog, it is still possible to hit such trouble. So running robinhood when making snapshot may increase such race possibility, but disabling robinhood does not means resolved the issue. The final solution should be the enhancement of snapshot-mount logic.
> 
> I did not find related LU ticket for this issue.
> 
> --
> Cheers,
> Nasf
> 
> From: lustre-discuss [mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org] On Behalf Of Robert Redl
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 6:54 PM
> To: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre/ZFS snapshots mount error
> 
> 
> Thanks for the fast reply! If I understood correctly, it is currently not possible to use the changelog feature together with the snapshot feature, right?
> 
> Is there already a LU-Ticket about that?
> 
> Cheers,
> Robert
> 
> On 09/10/2018 02:57 PM, Yong, Fan wrote:
> It is suspected that there were some llog to be handled when the snapshot was making Then when mount-up such snapshot, some conditions trigger the llog cleanup/modification automatically. So it is not related with your actions when mount the snapshot. Since we cannot control the system status when making the snapshot, then we have to skip llog related cleanup/modification against the snapshot when mount the snapshot. Such ?skip? related logic is just what we need.
> 
> Cheers,
> Nasf
> From: lustre-discuss [mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org] On Behalf Of Robert Redl
> Sent: Saturday, September 8, 2018 9:04 PM
> To: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
> Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre/ZFS snapshots mount error
> 
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> we have a similar setup with Lustre on ZFS and we make regular use of snapshots for the purpose of backups (backups on tape use snapshots as source). We would like to use robinhood in future and the question is now how to do it.
> 
> Would it be a workaround to disable the robinhood daemon temporary during the mount process?
> Does the problem only occur when changelogs are consumed during the process of mounting a snapshot? Or is it also a problem when changelogs are consumed while the snapshot remains mounted (which is for us typically several hours)?
> Is there already an LU-ticket about this issue?
> 
> Thanks!
> Robert
> --
> Dr. Robert Redl
> Scientific Programmer, "Waves to Weather" (SFB/TRR165)
> Meteorologisches Institut
> Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit?t M?nchen
> Theresienstr. 37, 80333 M?nchen, Germany
> Am 03.09.2018 um 08:16 schrieb Yong, Fan:
> I would say that it is not your operations order caused trouble. Instead, it is related with the snapshot mount logic. As mentioned in former reply, we need some patch for the llog logic to avoid modifying llog under snapshot mode.
> 
> 
> --
> Cheers,
> Nasf
> From: Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) [mailto:benjamin.kirk at nasa.gov]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 7:53 PM
> To: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger at whamcloud.com><mailto:adilger at whamcloud.com>; Yong, Fan <fan.yong at intel.com><mailto:fan.yong at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre/ZFS snapshots mount error
> 
> The MDS situation is very basic: active/passive mds0/mds1 for both fas & fsB.  fsA has the combined msg/mdt in a single zfs filesystem, and fsB has its own mdt in a separate zfs filesystem.  mds0 is primary for all.
> 
> fsA & fsB DO both have changelogs enabled to feed robinhood databases.
> 
> What?s the recommended procedure here we should follow before mounting the snapshots?
> 
> 1) disable changelogs on the active mdt?s (this will compromise robinhood, requiring a rescan?), or
> 2) temporarily halt changelog consumption / cleanup (e.g. stop robinhood in our case) and then mount the snapshot?
> 
> Thanks for the help!
> 
> --
> Benjamin S. Kirk, Ph.D.
> NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center
> Acting Chief, Aeroscience & Flight Mechanics Division
> 
> On Aug 27, 2018, at 7:33 PM, Yong, Fan <fan.yong at intel.com<mailto:fan.yong at intel.com>> wrote:
> 
> According to the stack trace, someone was trying to cleanup old empty llogs during mount the snapshot. We do NOT allow any modification during mount snapshot; otherwise, it will trigger ZFS backend BUG(). That is why we add LASSERT() when start the transaction. One possible solution is that, we can add some check in the llog logic to avoid modifying llog under snapshot mode.
> 
> 
> --
> Cheers,
> Nasf
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lustre-discuss [mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Dilger
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 5:57 AM
> To: Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) <benjamin.kirk at nasa.gov<mailto:benjamin.kirk at nasa.gov>>
> Cc: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
> Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre/ZFS snapshots mount error
> 
> It's probably best to file an LU ticket for this issue.
> 
> It looks like there is something with the log processing at mount that is trying to modify the configuration files.  I'm not sure whether that should be allowed or not.
> 
> Does fab have the same MGS as fsA?  Does it have the same MDS node as fsA?
> If it has a different MDS, you might consider to give it its own MGS as well.
> That doesn't have to be a separate MGS node, just a separate filesystem (ZFS fileset in the same zpool) on the MDS node.
> 
> Cheers, Andreas
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 27, 2018, at 10:18, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) <benjamin.kirk at nasa.gov<mailto:benjamin.kirk at nasa.gov>> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> We have two filesystems, fsA & fsB (eadc below).  Both of which get snapshots taken daily, rotated over a week.  It?s a beautiful feature we?ve been using in production ever since it was introduced with 2.10.
> 
> -) We?ve got Lustre/ZFS 2.10.4 on CentOS 7.5.
> -) Both fsA & fsB have changelogs active.
> -) fsA has combined mgt/mdt on a single ZFS filesystem.
> -) fsB has a single mdt on a single ZFS filesystem.
> -) for fsA, I have no issues mounting any of the snapshots via lctl.
> -) for fsB, I can mount the most three recent snapshots, then encounter errors:
> 
> [root at hpfs-fsl-mds0 ~]# lctl snapshot_mount -F eadc -n eadc_AutoSS-Mon
> mounted the snapshot eadc_AutoSS-Mon with fsname 3d40bbc
> [root at hpfs-fsl-mds0 ~]# lctl snapshot_umount -F eadc -n
> eadc_AutoSS-Mon
> [root at hpfs-fsl-mds0 ~]# lctl snapshot_mount -F eadc -n eadc_AutoSS-Sun
> mounted the snapshot eadc_AutoSS-Sun with fsname 584c07a
> [root at hpfs-fsl-mds0 ~]# lctl snapshot_umount -F eadc -n
> eadc_AutoSS-Sun
> [root at hpfs-fsl-mds0 ~]# lctl snapshot_mount -F eadc -n eadc_AutoSS-Sat
> mounted the snapshot eadc_AutoSS-Sat with fsname 4e646fe
> [root at hpfs-fsl-mds0 ~]# lctl snapshot_umount -F eadc -n
> eadc_AutoSS-Sat
> [root at hpfs-fsl-mds0 ~]# lctl snapshot_mount -F eadc -n eadc_AutoSS-Fri
> mount.lustre: mount metadata/meta-eadc at eadc_AutoSS-Fri at
> /mnt/eadc_AutoSS-Fri_MDT0000 failed: Read-only file system Can't mount
> the snapshot eadc_AutoSS-Fri: Read-only file system
> 
> The relevant bits from dmesg are
> [1353434.417762] Lustre: 3d40bbc-MDT0000: set dev_rdonly on this
> device [1353434.417765] Lustre: Skipped 3 previous similar messages
> [1353434.649480] Lustre: 3d40bbc-MDT0000: Imperative Recovery enabled,
> recovery window shrunk from 300-900 down to 150-900 [1353434.649484]
> Lustre: Skipped 3 previous similar messages [1353434.866228] Lustre:
> 3d40bbc-MDD0000: changelog on [1353434.866233] Lustre: Skipped 1
> previous similar message [1353435.427744] Lustre: 3d40bbc-MDT0000:
> Connection restored to ... at tcp<mailto:... at tcp> (at ... at tcp<mailto:... at tcp>) [1353435.427747] Lustre:
> Skipped 23 previous similar messages [1353445.255899] Lustre: Failing
> over 3d40bbc-MDT0000 [1353445.255903] Lustre: Skipped 3 previous
> similar messages [1353445.256150] LustreError: 11-0:
> 3d40bbc-OST0000-osc-MDT0000: operation ost_disconnect to node ... at tcp<mailto:... at tcp>
> failed: rc = -107 [1353445.257896] LustreError: Skipped 23 previous
> similar messages [1353445.353874] Lustre: server umount
> 3d40bbc-MDT0000 complete [1353445.353877] Lustre: Skipped 3 previous
> similar messages [1353475.302224] Lustre: 4e646fe-MDD0000: changelog
> on [1353475.302228] Lustre: Skipped 1 previous similar message [1353498.964016] LustreError: 25582:0:(osd_handler.c:341:osd_trans_create()) 36ca26b-MDT0000-osd: someone try to start transaction under readonly mode, should be disabled.
> [1353498.967260] LustreError: 25582:0:(osd_handler.c:341:osd_trans_create()) Skipped 1 previous similar message
> [1353498.968829] CPU: 6 PID: 25582 Comm: mount.lustre Kdump: loaded Tainted: P           OE  ------------   3.10.0-862.6.3.el7.x86_64 #1
> [1353498.968830] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-6027TR-D71FRF/X9DRT,
> BIOS 3.2a 08/04/2015 [1353498.968832] Call Trace:
> [1353498.968841]  [<ffffffffb5b0e80e>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> [1353498.968851]  [<ffffffffc0cbe5db>] osd_trans_create+0x38b/0x3d0
> [osd_zfs] [1353498.968876]  [<ffffffffc1116044>]
> llog_destroy+0x1f4/0x3f0 [obdclass] [1353498.968887]
> [<ffffffffc111f0f6>] llog_cat_reverse_process_cb+0x246/0x3f0
> [obdclass] [1353498.968897]  [<ffffffffc111a32c>]
> llog_reverse_process+0x38c/0xaa0 [obdclass] [1353498.968910]
> [<ffffffffc111eeb0>] ? llog_cat_process_cb+0x4e0/0x4e0 [obdclass]
> [1353498.968922]  [<ffffffffc111af69>]
> llog_cat_reverse_process+0x179/0x270 [obdclass] [1353498.968932]
> [<ffffffffc1115585>] ? llog_init_handle+0xd5/0x9a0 [obdclass]
> [1353498.968943]  [<ffffffffc1116e78>] ? llog_open_create+0x78/0x320
> [obdclass] [1353498.968949]  [<ffffffffc12e55f0>] ?
> mdd_root_get+0xf0/0xf0 [mdd] [1353498.968954]  [<ffffffffc12ec7af>]
> mdd_prepare+0x13ff/0x1c70 [mdd] [1353498.968966]  [<ffffffffc166b037>]
> mdt_prepare+0x57/0x3b0 [mdt] [1353498.968983]  [<ffffffffc1183afd>]
> server_start_targets+0x234d/0x2bd0 [obdclass] [1353498.968999]
> [<ffffffffc1153500>] ? class_config_dump_handler+0x7e0/0x7e0
> [obdclass] [1353498.969012]  [<ffffffffc118541d>]
> server_fill_super+0x109d/0x185a [obdclass] [1353498.969025]
> [<ffffffffc115cef8>] lustre_fill_super+0x328/0x950 [obdclass]
> [1353498.969038]  [<ffffffffc115cbd0>] ?
> lustre_common_put_super+0x270/0x270 [obdclass] [1353498.969041]
> [<ffffffffb561f3bf>] mount_nodev+0x4f/0xb0 [1353498.969053]
> [<ffffffffc1154f18>] lustre_mount+0x38/0x60 [obdclass]
> [1353498.969055]  [<ffffffffb561ff3e>] mount_fs+0x3e/0x1b0 [1353498.969060]  [<ffffffffb563d4b7>] vfs_kern_mount+0x67/0x110 [1353498.969062]  [<ffffffffb563fadf>] do_mount+0x1ef/0xce0 [1353498.969066]  [<ffffffffb55f7c2c>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x3c/0x200 [1353498.969069]  [<ffffffffb5640913>] SyS_mount+0x83/0xd0 [1353498.969074]  [<ffffffffb5b20795>] system_call_fastpath+0x1c/0x21 [1353498.969079] LustreError: 25582:0:(llog_cat.c:1027:llog_cat_reverse_process_cb()) 36ca26b-MDD0000: fail to destroy empty log: rc = -30
> [1353498.970785] CPU: 6 PID: 25582 Comm: mount.lustre Kdump: loaded Tainted: P           OE  ------------   3.10.0-862.6.3.el7.x86_64 #1
> [1353498.970786] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-6027TR-D71FRF/X9DRT,
> BIOS 3.2a 08/04/2015 [1353498.970787] Call Trace:
> [1353498.970790]  [<ffffffffb5b0e80e>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> [1353498.970795]  [<ffffffffc0cbe5db>] osd_trans_create+0x38b/0x3d0
> [osd_zfs] [1353498.970807]  [<ffffffffc1117921>]
> llog_cancel_rec+0xc1/0x880 [obdclass] [1353498.970817]
> [<ffffffffc111e13b>] llog_cat_cleanup+0xdb/0x380 [obdclass]
> [1353498.970827]  [<ffffffffc111f14d>]
> llog_cat_reverse_process_cb+0x29d/0x3f0 [obdclass] [1353498.970838]
> [<ffffffffc111a32c>] llog_reverse_process+0x38c/0xaa0 [obdclass]
> [1353498.970848]  [<ffffffffc111eeb0>] ?
> llog_cat_process_cb+0x4e0/0x4e0 [obdclass] [1353498.970858]
> [<ffffffffc111af69>] llog_cat_reverse_process+0x179/0x270 [obdclass]
> [1353498.970868]  [<ffffffffc1115585>] ? llog_init_handle+0xd5/0x9a0
> [obdclass] [1353498.970878]  [<ffffffffc1116e78>] ?
> llog_open_create+0x78/0x320 [obdclass] [1353498.970883]
> [<ffffffffc12e55f0>] ? mdd_root_get+0xf0/0xf0 [mdd] [1353498.970887]
> [<ffffffffc12ec7af>] mdd_prepare+0x13ff/0x1c70 [mdd] [1353498.970894]
> [<ffffffffc166b037>] mdt_prepare+0x57/0x3b0 [mdt] [1353498.970908]
> [<ffffffffc1183afd>] server_start_targets+0x234d/0x2bd0 [obdclass]
> [1353498.970924]  [<ffffffffc1153500>] ?
> class_config_dump_handler+0x7e0/0x7e0 [obdclass] [1353498.970938]
> [<ffffffffc118541d>] server_fill_super+0x109d/0x185a [obdclass]
> [1353498.970950]  [<ffffffffc115cef8>] lustre_fill_super+0x328/0x950
> [obdclass] [1353498.970962]  [<ffffffffc115cbd0>] ?
> lustre_common_put_super+0x270/0x270 [obdclass] [1353498.970964]
> [<ffffffffb561f3bf>] mount_nodev+0x4f/0xb0 [1353498.970976]
> [<ffffffffc1154f18>] lustre_mount+0x38/0x60 [obdclass]
> [1353498.970978]  [<ffffffffb561ff3e>] mount_fs+0x3e/0x1b0
> [1353498.970980]  [<ffffffffb563d4b7>] vfs_kern_mount+0x67/0x110
> [1353498.970982]  [<ffffffffb563fadf>] do_mount+0x1ef/0xce0
> [1353498.970984]  [<ffffffffb55f7c2c>] ?
> kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x3c/0x200 [1353498.970986]
> [<ffffffffb5640913>] SyS_mount+0x83/0xd0 [1353498.970989]
> [<ffffffffb5b20795>] system_call_fastpath+0x1c/0x21 [1353498.970996]
> LustreError: 25582:0:(mdd_device.c:354:mdd_changelog_llog_init())
> 36ca26b-MDD0000: changelog init failed: rc = -30 [1353498.972790]
> LustreError: 25582:0:(mdd_device.c:427:mdd_changelog_init())
> 36ca26b-MDD0000: changelog setup during init failed: rc = -30
> [1353498.974525] LustreError:
> 25582:0:(mdd_device.c:1061:mdd_prepare()) 36ca26b-MDD0000: failed to
> initialize changelog: rc = -30 [1353498.976229] LustreError:
> 25582:0:(obd_mount_server.c:1879:server_fill_super()) Unable to start
> targets: -30 [1353499.072002] LustreError:
> 25582:0:(obd_mount.c:1582:lustre_fill_super()) Unable to mount  (-30)
> 
> 
> I?m hoping those traces mean something to someone - any ideas?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --
> Benjamin S. Kirk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
> 
> Cheers, Andreas
> ---
> Andreas Dilger
> CTO Whamcloud
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> 
> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
> 
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20180911/160cde21/attachment.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of lustre-discuss Digest, Vol 150, Issue 14
> ***********************************************